Jackman v. Lambertson
Decision Date | 11 March 1905 |
Docket Number | 14,038 |
Parties | H. F. JACKMAN, as Executor, etc., v. N. LAMBERTSON |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1905.
Error from Ottawa district court; ROLLIN R. REES, judge.
Case reversed and remanded.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. EXEMPTIONS--Proprietor of Thrashing Outfit. A person residing in this state who is the head of a family and whose principal business is the running of a thrashing-machine is included in the phrase "or other person," as used in subdivision 8 of section 3018, General Statutes of 1901.
2. EXEMPTIONS--Thrashing-machine Exempt. The thrashing-separator, traction-engine, belts, and all parts necessary to constitute a thrashing-machine, kept by such person for the purpose of carrying on his business of thrashing, are "implements," under said subdivision 8, and, together with all tools necessary to operate the same, are exempt to such resident head of a family while used for the purpose of carrying on such business.
3. EXEMPTIONS--Chattel Mortgage--Joint Consent Necessary. While such thrashing outfit is used and kept for such purpose by such resident head of a family, if he be a man and have a wife he cannot create any valid lien on the same except by the joint consent of himself and wife, and a mortgage given thereon under such circumstances, while the relation of husband and wife exists is invalid unless executed by both husband and wife.
Thompson & King, for plaintiff in error.
F. D Boyce, for defendant in error.
OPINION
This case was tried in the court below without the aid of a jury, and the court made the following succinct findings of fact and conclusions of law:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mississippi Road Supply Co. v. Hester
...Surety Co., 168 Miss. 877, 152 So. 292; Reeves v. Bascue, 76 Kan. 333; Advance-Rumley Thresher Co. v. Evans, 103 Kan. 532; Jackman v. Lambertson, 71 Kan. 138; Bliss Vedder, 34 Kan. 57; In re Robinson, 206 F. 176; Seiler v. Buckhold, 293 S.W. 210; Pluckham v. American Br. Co., 93 N.Y.S. 784,......
-
Grandview State Bank v. Torrance
...70 P. 1056; Skinner v. First Nat. Bank of Winfield, 83 Kan. 842, 66 P. 997; Alexander v. Logan, 65 Kan. 505, 70 P. 339; Jackson v. Lambertson, 71 Kan. 138, 80 P. 55; Wickham v. Traders' State Bank, 95 Kan. 657, P. 433; Babbitt v. Bent County Bank of Las Animas, 50 Colo. 258, 108 P. 1003; Bo......
-
The Federal Agency Investment Company v. Baker
...28 P. 1011); "the threshing-separator, traction engine, belts, and all parts necessary to constitute a threshing machine" (Jackson v. Lambertson, 71 Kan. 138, 80 P. 55); "a traction engine and saws, belts, carrier, and other appliances commonly used in connection with such an engine for saw......
-
Hoxie State Bank of Hoxie v. Vaughn
... ... R. S. 58--312; ... Alexander v. Logan, 65 Kan. 505, 70 P. 339; ... Searle v. Gregg, 67 Kan. 1, 72 P. 544; Jackman ... v. Lambertson, 71 Kan. 138, 80 P. 55; Reeves & Co ... v. Bascue, 76 Kan. 333, 91 P. 77, 123 Am.St.Rep. 137. It ... is also elementary that in ... ...