Jacks v. State, No. 30115
| Court | Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas |
| Writing for the Court | MORRISON |
| Citation | 317 S.W.2d 731,167 Tex.Crim. 1 |
| Docket Number | No. 30115 |
| Decision Date | 12 November 1958 |
| Parties | Abe Shelton JACKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Page 731
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
[167 TEXCRIM 1]
Page 732
L. D. Hartwell, Greenville, for appellant.Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.
The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, 15 years.
Rosenbaum, a 60-year old police officer of the City of Terrell, was severely beaten by the appellant and his companion Hardy. It was five days before Rosenbaum regained consciousness, two weeks until he was released from the hospital, and the wounds which he sustained were considered serious by the doctors who treated him. The assault occurred when Rosenbaum attempted to place the appellant and Hardy under arrest, and immediately following the assault the appellant and Hardy fled. The appellant was arrested the following day in Jacksonville in possession of Rosenbaum's pistol, and shortly thereafter, [167 TEXCRIM 2] upon being returned to Terrell, the appellant confessed in writing. This confession, which was introduced in evidence without objection, recited that the appellant (aged 21) and Hardy had taken two girls to Dallas, where they drank beer at taverns and purchased a case to bring back with them, and that while passing through Terrell they ran a red light and were apprehended near the edge of the city by Rosenbaum, who was in uniform. We quote from the confession as follows:
'* * * When I started towards the Patrol Car Hardy whispered to me 'Let's jump him,' and that's when I hit Mr. Rosenbaum.
* * *
'I had inside my first a piece of pipe that was filled with lead. After Mr. Rosenbaum fell down I fell down on him and while I was down on him, Hardy started stomping Mr. Rosenbaum in the face with his foot. I would say that he stomped him nine or ten times in the face. While Mr. Rosenbaum was down he started his hand towards his holster as if to get his
Page 733
gun, and when he did that I went for Mr. Rosenbaum's gun and beat him to it, and I took the gun out of the holster and took it with me * * *.'According to a witness, the appellant hit Rosenbaum in the head with this pistol which he had taken from him as Rosenbaum lay on the ground.
We shall discuss the facts more fully in connection with our discussion of the contentions advanced in appellant's brief.
He first contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the assault was made with malice aforethought and with the specific intent to kill. Appellant seems to be laboring under the impression that, absent any showing of prior difficulties between the parties, malice is not shown regardless of the ferocity of the attack. With this we cannot agree. It was amply shown by the testimony of the doctors that any or all of the means used by the appellant or his companion were sufficient to and calculated to produce death or serious bodily injury.
Appellant next complains of the testimony of three witnesses who attested to the bad reputation of the appellant.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jurek v. Estelle, No. 78-1374
...to the voluntariness of the confession. Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219, 62 S.Ct. 280, 86 L.Ed. 166; Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Scanlin v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 183, 305 S.W.2d 357; McHenry v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 293 S.W.2d The record amply supports the findin......
-
David v. State, No. 42663
...is a matter resting solely with the jurors when they are called upon by law to assess punishment. Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Hunt v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 51, 317 S.W.2d 743; 16 Tex.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 19, p. For cases where the death penalty has been upheld when......
-
Jurek v. State, No. 49416
...to the voluntariness of the confession. Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219, 62 S.Ct. 280, 86 L.Ed. 166; Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Scanlin v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 183, 305 S.W.2d 357; McHenry v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 293 S.W.2d The record amply supports the findin......
-
Lopez v. State, No. 56827
...it is not necessary that the witness be able to name the specific persons who have made such comments. Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731 Page 567 All of appellant's grounds of error have been carefully considered and are overruled. The judgment is affirmed. ...
-
Jurek v. Estelle, No. 78-1374
...to the voluntariness of the confession. Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219, 62 S.Ct. 280, 86 L.Ed. 166; Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Scanlin v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 183, 305 S.W.2d 357; McHenry v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 293 S.W.2d The record amply supports the findin......
-
David v. State, No. 42663
...is a matter resting solely with the jurors when they are called upon by law to assess punishment. Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Hunt v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 51, 317 S.W.2d 743; 16 Tex.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 19, p. For cases where the death penalty has been upheld when......
-
Jurek v. State, No. 49416
...to the voluntariness of the confession. Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219, 62 S.Ct. 280, 86 L.Ed. 166; Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731; Scanlin v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 183, 305 S.W.2d 357; McHenry v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 293 S.W.2d The record amply supports the findin......
-
Lopez v. State, No. 56827
...it is not necessary that the witness be able to name the specific persons who have made such comments. Jacks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 317 S.W.2d 731 Page 567 All of appellant's grounds of error have been carefully considered and are overruled. The judgment is affirmed. ...