Jackson & Nash v. E. Timothy Mcauliffe PLLC

Decision Date28 December 2010
Docket Number102265/06,3286
Citation2010 NY Slip Op 09564
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesJackson & Nash LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. Timothy McAuliffe PLLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents. [And a Third-Party Action]

2010 NY Slip Op 09564

Jackson & Nash LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E. Timothy McAuliffe PLLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
[And a Third-Party Action]

3286
102265/06

Supreme Court Of The State Of New York
Appellate Division
First Department

Decided on December 28, 2010


Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, New York (Carol A. Sigmond of counsel), for appellant.

Lebow & Sokolow, LLP, New York (Mark D. Lebow of counsel), for respondents.

Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, McGuire, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered December 15, 2008, which granted the motion of the individual defendant (McAuliffe) for summary judgment dismissing that portion of the complaint that sought an accounting and recovery of commissions he received as co-executor of an estate, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment on its claims sounding in, inter alia, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment for damages for alleged unbilled time for the period July 1-August 14, 2003, affirmed, with costs.

A client of McAuliffe died in April 2003 while he was a partner at plaintiff firm. Her will named McAuliffe co-executor, and McAuliffe received preliminary letters testamentary in May 2003. He continued to carry out his duties as executor after he left the firm on August 14, 2003. In November 2003, he received letters testamentary; in December 2005, the estate was settled by agreement. McAuliffe received an executor's commission (see SCPA 2307) in December 2005.

The firm partnership agreement provided that "commissions payable to a Partner for acting as an executor... shall belong to the Firm." However, since the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act provides that compensation for the administration of an estate "shall be payable in such proportions and upon such accounting as shall be fixed by the court settling the account of the person holding successive or different letters..." (SCPA 2307[5][b] [emphasis added]), no commission was "payable" until December 2005 (see Matter of Maurice, 74 AD2d 906 [1980], appeal dismissed 50 NY2d 1059 [1980]; Matter of Boddy, 136 Misc 2d 87, 89 [1987]), and at that time McAuliffe was no longer a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT