Jackson v. City of Mobile, 1 Div. 538.
| Citation | 33 Ala.App. 95,30 So.2d 40 |
| Decision Date | 15 April 1947 |
| Docket Number | 1 Div. 538. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
| Parties | JACKSON v. CITY OF MOBILE |
M. F. Dozier, of Mobile, for appellant.
Harry Seale, of Mobile, for appellee.
Appealing to the circuit court from his conviction in the Recorder's Court of the City of Mobile for violation of the anti lottery ordinance of said city this appellant was again found guilty. From his conviction in the circuit court he filed his appeal to this court.
The record discloses that no errors were assigned in his appeal to this court.
Proceedings for violations of misdemeanor ordinances are quasi criminal, and on appeal are subject to rules governing civil appeals. Therefore in the absence of assignments of error in such cases, of which this is one, no question is presented for review. See 15 Ala.Dig., Municipal Corporations, k 642(1), for numerous cases.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Parks v. City of Montgomery
...Davis v. City of Guntersville, 27 Ala.App. 208, 169 So. 222; Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala.App. 94, 30 So.2d 40; Jackson v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala.App. 95, 30 So.2d 40; Ekornes v. City of Mobile, 34 Ala.App. 159, 37 So.2d 433; Griffith v. City of Birmingham, 34 Ala.App. 225, 39 So.2d 693......
-
Fiorella v. City of Birmingham
...conviction for violation of a city ordinance, it is quasi criminal, and subject to the rules governing civil appeals. Jackson v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala.App. 95, 30 So.2d 40. We shall therefore limit our review to the errors specified in appellant's brief. Several grounds of demurrer argued ......
-
Walls v. Borders
... ... 95 WALLS v. BORDERS. 4 Div. 991.Alabama Court of AppealsApril 15, 1947 ... R. Belcher, both of Phenix ... City, for appellant ... P ... B. Traweek, ... ...
-
Arnold v. City of Mobile
...30 So.2d 40 33 Ala.App. 94 ARNOLD v. CITY OF MOBILE. 1 Div. 537.Alabama Court of AppealsApril 15, 1947 ... [33 ... ...