Jackson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Decision Date01 July 2022
Docket Number9885-20
PartiesANTHONY JACKSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
CourtU.S. Tax Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION
Courtney D. Jones Judge

On April 29, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. This case was called from the calendar at the Des Moines, Iowa Remote Trial Session of the Court on May 9, 2022. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard.

The Court then ordered petitioner to show cause, on or before June 23, 2022, why respondent's Motion to Dismiss should not be granted and a decision entered against petitioner as set forth in respondent's Motion. The Order advised petitioner that failure to respond would likely result in the Court granting respondent's motion and entering an order and decision against petitioner.

To date, the Court has not received a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, objection to respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, returned mail, or any other correspondence from petitioner.

Giving due regard to the representations contained in respondent's Motion to Dismiss, and due to petitioner's failure to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause, failure to appear for trial, and failure to otherwise prosecute this case, it is

ORDERED that the Court's May 13, 2022, Order to Show Cause is made absolute. It is further

ORDERED that respondent's April 29, 2022, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further ORDERED and DECIDED that there is a deficiency in Federal income tax due from petitioner of $7,020, and penalty under I.R.C. § 6662(a) of $1,404, for 2017.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT