Jackson v. People
| Decision Date | 25 May 1860 |
| Citation | 8 Mich. 262 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
| Parties | Charles Jackson v. The People |
OPINION
Recorder's court: Error. Error will not lie on a conviction in the Recorder's court of Detroit, for an offense against a city ordinance. [1]
---------
Notes:
[1]See the same case, ante, pp. 78, 110.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
People v. Mallory
...the village ordinances are not considered criminal offenses. Mixer v. Supervisors, 26 Mich. 422; People v. Jackson, 8 Mich. 110 (Jackson v. People, 8 Mich. 262);' Village of Vicksburg v. Briggs, 85 Mich. 502, 508, 48 N.W. 625, 'The term 'criminal cases,' used in the laws, refers to none but......
-
Irvin v. State
...are not considered criminal offenses. People ex rel. Mixer v. Board of Supervisors, 26 Mich. 422; People v. Jackson, 8 Mich. 110 (Jackson v. People, 8 Mich. 262);' Village of Vicksburg v. Briggs, 85 Mich. 502, 508, 48 N.W. 625, "The term 'criminal cases,' used in the laws, refers to none bu......
-
State v. Muir
...35 La. Ann. 1193; Cooper v. People, 41 Mich. 403; People v. Jackson, 8 Mich. 110; People v. Maurster County, 26 Mich. 424; Jackson v. People, 8 Mich. 262. STATEMENT OF FACTS. The facts herein are agreed to be as follows, to-wit: Mexico is a city of the third class and is located in Audrain ......
-
Grosscup v. Hunt, Motion No. 230.
...reserved; in People v. Jackson, 8 Mich. 110, it was held that the case could not be heard on exceptions before judgment; and in Jackson v. People, 8 Mich. 262, that it could not be heard on writ of error; but in Jackson v. People, 9 Mich. 111, 77 Am. Dec. 491, the case was heard and dispose......
Request a trial to view additional results