Jackson v. Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, Inc
Decision Date | 30 June 1937 |
Docket Number | 5468 |
Citation | 175 So. 688 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Parties | JACKSON v. SAENGER-EHRLICH ENTERPRISES, Inc |
Frank A. Blanchard and Chas. L. Mayer, both of Shreveport, for appellant.
Foster Hall, Barret & Smith, of Shreveport, for appellee.
While making her exit from the Saenger Theater in Shreveport, La after having witnessed a motion picture performance plaintiff fell on a stairway and received injuries. She claims damages from the owner and operator of the theater in the amount of $ 1,525.
The trial court rejected her demands and she appealed.
In his written opinion, the district judge correctly states that:
Supplementary to the last paragraph of the preceding quotation, it can properly be said that operators of establishments such as the one in question are not insurers of persons patronizing them. They must, however, be free from negligence. Givens v. De Soto Building Co. et al., 156 La. 377, 100 So. 534; McKelvy v. Capitol Amusement Co. (La.App.) 159 So. 143. They are required to exercise care, for the protection of their patrons against injury, proportionate to the danger known or reasonably to be apprehended, and commensurate with the circumstances and risks of the situation. 62 Corpus Juris, verbo, Theaters and Shows, §53.
The question of whether or not defendant failed to use the required care and was negligent is one of fact and must be decided solely from the evidence taken on the trial of the case.
The record contains a mass of testimony relating to the particular stairway, and the exact place thereon, where the fall occurred, and to the cause of plaintiff's falling. This is conflicting beyond reconciliation. We shall content ourselves with merely summarizing the proof given in behalf of the respective litigants. A detailed discussion of the testimony of each witness will be of no benefit.
The evidence offered by plaintiff's witnesses tends to show that Mrs. Jackson and her husband went to the theater between 8:30 and 9:00 o'clock. After purchasing the necessary tickets, they proceeded through the east passageway, ascended the stairs therein located, and occupied...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf Course
...slip with him, with resulting liability. (Sharpless v. Pantages, 178 Cal. 122, 172 P. 384 (loose carpeting); cf. Jackson v. Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, La.App., 175 So. 688 (high heels through carpet); Heckel v. Standard Gateway Theatre, 229 Wis. 80, 281 N.W. 640 (terrazzo stairway covered......
-
Cassanova v. Paramount-Richards Theatres
... ... on the screen. * * * " ... In Gunn v ... Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, Inc., et al., 192 So. 744, 745, ... the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit in ... the protection of their patrons against injuries. Jackson v ... Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, La.App., 175 So. 688; McKelvy v ... Capitol Amusement ... ...
-
Cavaretta v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.
... ... seats provided for their use. Lonatro v. Palace Theatre ... Co., 5 La.App. 386; Jackson v. Saenger-Ehrlich ... Enterprises, Inc., La.App., 175 So. 688; McKelvy v ... Capitol Amusement ... ...
-
Mahfouz v. Southern Amusement Co.
... ... Jackson ... & Mayer, of Shreveport, for appellant ... Jas ... A. Horton, of New Orleans, and ... protection of their patrons against injuries. Jackson v ... Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, La.App., 175 So. 688; McKelvy v ... Capital Amusement Company, Inc., La.App., 159 ... ...