Jackson v. State

Docket NumberCR-10-43
Decision Date21 June 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Fields v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 2019
    ...which, through no negligence or fault of the defendant, was not brought forward before rendition of the judgment. Jackson v. State , 2018 Ark. 227, at 2, 549 S.W.3d 356, 358. The petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a fundamental error of fact extrinsic to the record. Id. at 2, 549 S.......
  • Swanigan v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2019
    ...claimed that Nelson's testimony was coerced. See Jones v. State , 2019 Ark. 272, 585 S.W.3d 153, 2019 WL 5078196 ; Jackson v. State , 2018 Ark. 227, 549 S.W.3d 356.4 Swanigan attached a CD as an exhibit to his petition, contending it is a recording of a phone call between his mother and Nel......
  • Tolston v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 16, 2020
    ...by the petitioner that the material was available to the State prior to trial and that the defense did not have it. Jackson v. State , 2018 Ark. 227, 549 S.W.3d 356. When a petitioner alleges a Brady violation as the basis for his or her claim of relief in coram nobis proceedings, the facts......
  • Hunt v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2019
    ...a petition for writ of error coram nobis after a judgment has been affirmed on appeal only after we grant permission. Jackson v. State , 2018 Ark. 227, 549 S.W.3d 356. Hunt does not provide a meritorious basis for issuance of the writ in his petition, and we deny the petition.Hunt was convi......
  • Get Started for Free