Jackson v. State, No. SC07-659.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
| Citation | 959 So.2d 716 |
| Docket Number | No. SC07-659. |
| Parties | JACKSON v. STATE. |
| Decision Date | 03 July 2007 |
v.
STATE.
Appeal from the 2nd DCA 952 So.2d 613.
Decision without published opinion. Rev. granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 practice notes
-
Jackson v. State, No. SC07-659.
...Id. at 615. We have jurisdiction, art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., and accepted review to resolve the conflict. Jackson v. State, 959 So.2d 716 (Fla.2007) (accepting For the reasons explained below, we hold that the denial of counsel at sentencing is not a "sentencing error" under rule 3.800......
-
Beasley v. State, No. 4D06-4165.
...to correct sentencing error. In support of his position, he cites Jackson v. State, 952 So.2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), rev. granted, 959 So.2d 716 (Fla.2007), in which the victim testified at sentencing when defense counsel was not present. The Second District held this was a denial of couns......
2 cases
-
Jackson v. State, No. SC07-659.
...Id. at 615. We have jurisdiction, art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., and accepted review to resolve the conflict. Jackson v. State, 959 So.2d 716 (Fla.2007) (accepting For the reasons explained below, we hold that the denial of counsel at sentencing is not a "sentencing error" under rule 3.800......
-
Beasley v. State, No. 4D06-4165.
...to correct sentencing error. In support of his position, he cites Jackson v. State, 952 So.2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), rev. granted, 959 So.2d 716 (Fla.2007), in which the victim testified at sentencing when defense counsel was not present. The Second District held this was a denial of couns......