Jackson v. United States
| Decision Date | 23 February 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 08–263.,08–263. |
| Citation | 129 S.Ct. 1307 (Mem),555 U.S. 1163,173 L.Ed.2d 575 |
| Parties | John Alvis JACKSON, Jr. and Larry Andrew Carey, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed January 16, 2009.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
Edmonson v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co.
...notions of property rights] is the proper approach to defining ‘plan assets.’ ” Id. at 204 n. 34 (citing Jackson v. United States, 555 U.S. 1163, 129 S.Ct. 1307, 173 L.Ed.2d 575 (2009)).20 Doyle suggests that we should not apply the Acosta approach, as the assets in question are cash or fin......
-
Solis v. Plan Benefit Services, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-11474-DPW.
...of 18 U.S.C. § 664. Id. at 544. Jackson has since been vacated and remanded by the Supreme Court, Jackson v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1307, 1307, 173 L.Ed.2d 575 (2009). The remand was made in recognition of the government's modification of its legal position that the "asset" ......
-
U.S. v. García-Pastrana
...Clause challenges to § 669); United States v. Jackson, 524 F.3d 532, 534 (4th Cir. 2008), vacated on other grounds, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1307, 173 L.Ed.2d 575 (2009) (mentioning, without discussing, conviction under § The Defendants point out that, in enacting § 669, Congress did not ado......
-
Trs. of Mich. Reg'l Council of Carpenters' Emp. Benefits Fund v. H.B. Stubbs Co., 2:14–cv–11393.
...that the Supreme Court has “strongly indicated that unpaid contributions are not plan assets”) (citing Jackson v. United States, 555 U.S. 1163, 129 S.Ct. 1307, 173 L.Ed.2d 575 (2009) ); accord Pantoja, 500 Fed.Appx. at 896. And, based on the Court's research, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appe......
Request a trial to view additional results