Jackson v. Walker, No. 45938
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi |
| Writing for the Court | GILLESPIE |
| Citation | 240 So.2d 606 |
| Parties | Mrs. Vera E. JACKSON v. Mrs. J. P. WALKER, Sheriff & Tax Collector. |
| Docket Number | No. 45938 |
| Decision Date | 26 October 1970 |
Page 606
v.
Mrs. J. P. WALKER, Sheriff & Tax Collector.
Sam P. Cooper, Jr., Picayune, for appellant.
Entry of Appearance by L. Jack Stewart, Picayune, but no brief of appellee filed.
GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice.
The appellant filed a brief and an assignment of error. No brief was filed by the appellee. The case was submitted without argument.
In United States F. & G. Co. v. State for Use and Benefit of Tompkins, 204 So.2d 852 (Miss.1967), this Court stated:
The failure to file this brief (by the appellee) is tantamount to a confession of error, and will be accepted as such, and the judgment of the court below will be reversed, since an answer to the appellant's brief cannot be safely made by us, without our doing that which the appellee, by its attorney, should have done, i.e., brief the appellee's side of the case. This we are not called on to do, therefore the case falls within, and is governed by, W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527 (1932). (204 So.2d at 852-853).
Since the appellant's brief in the case at bar makes out an apparent case of error, we do not regard it our obligation to look to the record to find a way to avoid the force of the appellant's argument.
Reversed. Judgment rendered for the appellant.
RODGERS, JONES, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wells v. State, No. 2012–KA–01781–SCT.
...that presumption or show good cause, we have no choice but to hold the error conceded and rule for the defendant. See Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606, 606 (Miss.1970) (Where the appellant filed a brief and no brief was filed by the appellee, this Court concluded that “[s]ince the appellant......
-
Wells v. State, NO. 2012-KA-01781-SCT
...that presumption or show good cause, we have no choice but to hold the error conceded and rule for the defendant. See Jackson v. Walker, 240 So. 2d 606, 606 (Miss. 1970) (Where the appellant filed a brief and no brief was filed by the appellee, this Court concluded that "[s]ince the appella......
-
First Mobile Home Corp. v. Little, No. 47458
...(1943)). 204 So.2d at 852-853. Accord, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corporation v. Rogers, 284 So.2d 304 (Miss.1973); Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606 (Miss.1970); Charles F. Hayes & Associates, Inc. v. Blue, 233 So.2d 127 The foregoing rule is a good rule and its purpose is, of course, to......
-
Trammell v. State, No. 90-CA-802
...to a confession that Trammell's position is correct. See Gordon by Lewis v. Wheat, 465 So.2d 1087 (Miss.1985), and Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Sovereign immunity is an eroding doctrine. See Tucker v. City of Okolona, 227 So.2d 475 (Miss.1969) (maintenance and operati......
-
Wells v. State, No. 2012–KA–01781–SCT.
...that presumption or show good cause, we have no choice but to hold the error conceded and rule for the defendant. See Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606, 606 (Miss.1970) (Where the appellant filed a brief and no brief was filed by the appellee, this Court concluded that “[s]ince the appellant......
-
Wells v. State, NO. 2012-KA-01781-SCT
...that presumption or show good cause, we have no choice but to hold the error conceded and rule for the defendant. See Jackson v. Walker, 240 So. 2d 606, 606 (Miss. 1970) (Where the appellant filed a brief and no brief was filed by the appellee, this Court concluded that "[s]ince the appella......
-
First Mobile Home Corp. v. Little, No. 47458
...(1943)). 204 So.2d at 852-853. Accord, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corporation v. Rogers, 284 So.2d 304 (Miss.1973); Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606 (Miss.1970); Charles F. Hayes & Associates, Inc. v. Blue, 233 So.2d 127 The foregoing rule is a good rule and its purpose is, of course, to......
-
Trammell v. State, No. 90-CA-802
...to a confession that Trammell's position is correct. See Gordon by Lewis v. Wheat, 465 So.2d 1087 (Miss.1985), and Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Sovereign immunity is an eroding doctrine. See Tucker v. City of Okolona, 227 So.2d 475 (Miss.1969) (maintenance and operati......