Jacobs v. State

Decision Date08 June 1965
Docket NumberNo. 349,349
Citation210 A.2d 722,238 Md. 648
PartiesMartin JACOBS v. STATE of Maryland.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Marvin B. Steinberg, Baltimore, for appellant.

Robert F. Sweeney, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Thomas B. Finan, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Moylan, Jr., Asst. State's Atty., and James W. McAllister, State's Atty., for Baltimore City, Baltimore, (on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT, and BARNES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judge Harlan, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, found the appellant, Martin Jacobs, guilty of assault with intent to murder the prosecuting witness, Donald E. Stahl.

On February 4, 1964, Jacobs became involved in an argument with Stahl at 'Mary's Bar,' at Pratt and Wolfe Streets in Baltimore City over a shuffle board game. Both men had been drinking and Mary Krupa, the proprietress, to avoid any trouble at her place, asked Jacobs if he had a knife. Jacobs indicated that he had and the proprietress asked Jacobs to give it to her. He did this. The proprietress had been warned by a witness, Donald Canning, to 'break it up' as 'she was going to have some trouble.' Canning testified that he had heard Jacobs call Stahl a foul name and state that if Stahl would "slip out the door I'll cut you' or 'I'll cut you fast' or words to that effect.' This argument, however, was confined to verbal abuse. Stahl and others left 'Mary's Bar' and, with others, went over to 'Sophie's Bar' at Pratt and Durham Streets, near 'Mary's Bar.' Stahl played one or two games of shuffle board with Canning and ordered a beer and a bowl of soup. Fifteen to twenty minutes later Jacobs left 'Mary's Bar', after first receiving back his knife from the proprietress of that bar, and entered 'Sophie's Bar.' Immediately thereafter the argument between Jacobs and Stahl began again and there was more verbal abuse of Stahl by Jacobs. Miss Sophie, the proprietress of Sophie's Bar told Jacobs she wanted no trouble and he would have to leave. He then left.

There is some variation in the testimony in regard to how soon Stahl left Sophie's Bar after Jacobs had gone out. Miss Sophie testified 'He was eating, he was in the place at least fifteen minutes, maybe more, maybe longer.' Jacobs indicated that it was almost immediately, but when questioned by the trial court that 'it wasn't fifteen minutes as they say?', Jacobs replied 'I don't know.' Canning indicated that Stahl was eating his soup and 'was pretty hot,' and 'shortly after that, I thought it was almost immediately, but it must have been some time involved, shortly after that he went outside.' Jacobs was waiting on the outside, called Stahl a foul name, whereupon Stahl hit Jacobs twice and knocked him down. One of the blows fractured Jacobs' nose. Jacobs then cut Stahl with his knife. The wounds required over 300 stitches to close. Stahl was approximately 50 pounds heavier and three inches taller than Jacobs. When Jacobs was asked on cross-examination why he didn't run, he re...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Ebb v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1994
    ...Md. 203, 210, 214, 522 A.2d 1338, 1341, 1343 (1987); Wilson v. State, 261 Md. 551, 566, 276 A.2d 214, 221 (1971); Jacobs v. State, 238 Md. 648, 650, 210 A.2d 722, 723 (1965). See also Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 224, 571 A.2d 1251, 1260 (1990). Moreover, this Court has long made clear that......
  • Ware v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 14, 2000
    ...309 Md. 203, 214, 522 A.2d 1338, 1341 (1987); Wilson v. State, 261 Md. 551, 566, 276 A.2d 214, 221 (1971); Jacobs v. State, 238 Md. 648, 650, 210 A.2d 722, 723-[2]4 (1965). Even when an appellate court assesses the sufficiency of the evidence, it does not weigh it, see Clemson v. Butler Avi......
  • Robinson v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • May 25, 1999
    ...State, 287 Md. 675, 685, 414 A.2d 1266, 1271 (1980); Wilson v. State, 261 Md. 551, 566, 276 A.2d 214, 221 (1971); Jacobs v. State, 238 Md. 648, 650, 210 A.2d 722, 723-24 (1965). See also Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 224, 571 A.2d 1251, 1260 (1990) (requiring the court to "instruct the jury ......
  • Spain v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • April 7, 2005
    ...State, 287 Md. 675, 685, 414 A.2d 1266, 1271 (1980); Wilson v. State, 261 Md. 551, 566, 276 A.2d 214, 221 (1971); Jacobs v. State, 238 Md. 648, 650, 210 A.2d 722, 723-24 (1965). See also Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 224, 571 A.2d 1251, 1260 (1990) (requiring the court to "instruct the jury ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT