Jaffee v. Redmond, 95266
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Stevens |
| Citation | 518 U.S. 1,135 L.Ed.2d 337,116 S.Ct. 1923 |
| Parties | JAFFEE, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR FOR ALLEN, DECEASED v. REDMOND et al. |
| Docket Number | 95266 |
| Decision Date | 13 June 1996 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
923 practice notes
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
Mathews v. Harris, B265990
..., 16 Cal.4th at pp. 326-327, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 210, 940 P.2d 797.)212 Cal.Rptr.3d 573Gonzales further explained: "In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedin......
-
Sorenson v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., No. H038295
...operation of psychotherapy” (In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415, 422, 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 467 P.2d 557; see also Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 10, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337), the “privilege has been broadly construed in favor of the patient.” (Stritzinger, at p. 511, 194 Cal.Rpt......
Request a trial to view additional results
926 cases
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
Mathews v. Harris, B265990
..., 16 Cal.4th at pp. 326-327, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 210, 940 P.2d 797.)212 Cal.Rptr.3d 573Gonzales further explained: "In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedin......
-
Sorenson v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., No. H038295
...operation of psychotherapy” (In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415, 422, 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 467 P.2d 557; see also Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 10, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337), the “privilege has been broadly construed in favor of the patient.” (Stritzinger, at p. 511, 194 Cal.Rpt......
Request a trial to view additional results