Jaffee v. Redmond, 95266
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Stevens |
| Citation | 518 U.S. 1,135 L.Ed.2d 337,116 S.Ct. 1923 |
| Parties | JAFFEE, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR FOR ALLEN, DECEASED v. REDMOND et al. |
| Docket Number | 95266 |
| Decision Date | 13 June 1996 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
923 practice notes
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
Mathews v. Harris, B265990
..., 16 Cal.4th at pp. 326-327, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 210, 940 P.2d 797.)212 Cal.Rptr.3d 573Gonzales further explained: "In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedin......
-
Sorenson v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., No. H038295
...operation of psychotherapy” (In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415, 422, 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 467 P.2d 557; see also Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 10, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337), the “privilege has been broadly construed in favor of the patient.” (Stritzinger, at p. 511, 194 Cal.Rpt......
Request a trial to view additional results
926 cases
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
People v. Gonzales, No. S191240.
...a right exists]; NASA v. Nelson (2011) ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 746, 751–752, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 673 [same].) In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedings,......
-
Mathews v. Harris, B265990
..., 16 Cal.4th at pp. 326-327, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 210, 940 P.2d 797.)212 Cal.Rptr.3d 573Gonzales further explained: "In Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337, the United States Supreme Court adopted a psychotherapist-patient privilege applicable in federal proceedin......
-
Sorenson v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., No. H038295
...operation of psychotherapy” (In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415, 422, 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 467 P.2d 557; see also Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) 518 U.S. 1, 10, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337), the “privilege has been broadly construed in favor of the patient.” (Stritzinger, at p. 511, 194 Cal.Rpt......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 books & journal articles
-
Privileges
...psychotherapist and her patients in the course of diagnosis or treatment are protected from compelled disclosure.” Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 15 (1996) (a party asserting the privilege has the burden of showing the allegedly privileged communication was made (1) confidentially, (2) betw......
-
Table of Cases
...(D.C. Cir. 1984), 253 318 Antitrust Evidence Handbook Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc., 293 F.R.D. 578 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), 193 Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996), 133 James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 93 F.R.D. 138 (D. Del. 1982), 98, 119 In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig., 723 F.2d 23......
-
Deposing & examining the mental health expert
...between winning and losing a case. In addition, the plaintiff may waive the psychotherapist-patient privilege. In Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 15, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996), the Supreme Court found that, under Federal Rule of Evidence 502, there exists a psychotherapist-patie......
-
Table of cases
...2017 WL 1155898 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), §11:20 — J — Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. , 2021 WL 2104636 (E.D. Ky. 2021), §4:06 Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996), §§9:13, 9:14 Jepson, Inc. v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd., 30 F.3d 854 (7th Cir. 1994), §§1:72, 6:10 John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (U.S.A.) v. Cl......
Request a trial to view additional results