James Et Al v. Railroad Company

Decision Date01 December 1867
Citation18 L.Ed. 885,6 Wall. 752,73 U.S. 752
PartiesJAMES ET AL. v. RAILROAD COMPANY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Wisconsin; James, Brewer, Greenleaf, Justice, and others, being the appellants, and the Milwaukee and Minnesota Railroads appellee.

Messrs. Cary and Carlisle, for the appellants; Messrs. Cushing and Stark, contra.

Mr. Justice NELSON stated the case and delivered the opinion of the court.

The bill before us is a creditor's bill, filed by four different judgment creditors, against the defendants, to set aside as fraudulent and void against creditors the sale under a mortgage made to Barnes, 21st of June, 1858, for two millions of dollars, by the La Crosse and Milwaukee Railroad Company, which sale took place on the 21st of May, 1859, and under which the defendants' company was organized; and that the company be perpetually enjoined and restrained from exercising any control over the property or franchises mentioned in said mortgage, or from interfering in any manner with the road or its franchises; and, further, that the said company be decreed to take nothing under the sale, and that the property and franchises of the La Crosse and Milwaukee Company may be sold and applied, after discharging all prior liens, to the satisfaction of the judgments of the complainants.

The complainants consist of the firm of F. P. James &Co., who are the owners of a judgment against the La Crosse and Milwaukee Company for $26,353.51, recovered in the District Court of the United States for the District of Wisconsin, on the 5th of October, 1858, in favor of Edwin C. Litchfield, and which came to the complainants by assignment.

Nathaniel S. Bouton, who recovered in the same court a judgment against the same company for $7937.37, on the 5th of April, 1859, and which judgment came to the firm of F. P. James & Co., by assignment; Philip S. Justice and others, who recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court of Milwaukee County against the same company for $235.33, and E. Bradford Greenleaf, a judgment in the same court against the same company for $840.06. These judgments were liens on the La Crosse and Milwaukee Railroad, subsequent to the mortgage to Barnes, already referred to, which, with the sale under it, is sought to be set aside as fraudulent and void against creditors.

The mortgage was given to secure the payment of an issue of bonds for two millions of dollars, on the 21st of June, 1858, and which were issued accordingly by the president and secretary, and were made payable in thirty years. One thousand bonds of one thousand dollars each, fourteen...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Hess Warming & Ventilating Company v. Burlington Grain Elevator Company
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 4, 1919
    ... ... the lawmakers in making such provisions was to make stocks ... and bonds of a corporation worth their face value. Peoria ... Railroad Co. v. Thompson, 103 Ill. 187; Mayfield W. & L. Co. v. Graves County B. & T. Co., 170 Ky. 86; ... Altenberg v. Grant, 85 F. 345. (b) The ... title passing under it invalidated even though some few bonds ... might be held to be outstanding and due. James v ... Milwaukee Ry. Co., 6 Wall. 752; Edgar v. Ames, ... 255 F. 835. (7) The bank was a purchaser with notice ... Progressive Wall Paper ... ...
  • First Nat Bank of Cincinnati v. Flershem Arzt v. Same Clapier v. Same
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • January 8, 1934
    ...transfer does not remove the taint of illegality.11 Jackson v. Ludeling, 21 Wall. 616, 22 L.Ed. 492. Compare James v. Milwaukee & M. Railroad Co., 6 Wall. 752, 18 L.Ed. 885; Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 507, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931. Nor is it material that the corporati......
  • Kitchen v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1878
    ...12 Mo. 109; Thornton v. Irwin, 43 Mo. 153; Michoud v. Girod, 4 How. 503; Abbott v. American Hard Rubber Co., 33 Barb. 578, 594; James v. R. R. Co., 6 Wall. 752; C. C. & I. Co. v. Sherman, 20 Md. 117; H. S. Coal Co. v. C. C. & I. Co., 16 Md. 456; C. C. & I. Co. v. Sherman, 30 Barb. 563. (b) ......
  • Sweeney v. Grape Sugar Refining Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • November 19, 1887
    ... ... by A. J. Sweeney & Son and others, creditors of the Wheeling ... Grape Sugar & Refining Company, to set aside certain deeds of ... trust executed by it to W. A. Isett for the benefit of the ... Rolling-Mill Co. , 45 Mich. 103, 7 N.W. 695; ... Stewart v. Railroad Co. , 38 N. J ... Law, 505; Wallace v. Railroad Co. , ... 12 Hun, 460; Rolling-stock Co ... only as to the corporation and its stockholders, but its ... creditors. James v. Railroad Co. , ... 6 Wall. 752; Drury v. Cross , 7 ... Wall. 299; Coal Co. v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT