James Finley v. People of the State of California

Decision Date06 November 1911
Docket NumberNo. 15,15
Citation32 S.Ct. 13,56 L.Ed. 75,222 U.S. 28
PartiesJAMES W. FINLEY, Piff. in Err., v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. C. C. Calhoun, James N. Sharp, H. G. W. Dinkelspiel, Samuel T. Bush, and G. C. Ringolsky for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 28-30 intentionally omitted]Mr. U. S. Webb, Attorney General of California, and Mr. E. B. Power for defendant in error.

Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by Mr. Justice McKenna:

Section 246 of the Penal Code of the state of California provides as follows: 'Every person undergoing a life sentence in a state prison of this state, who, with malice aforethought, commits an assault upon the person of another with a deadly weapon or instrument, or by any means or force likely to produce great bodily injury, is punishable with death.'

Plaintiff in error was indicted under this section, tried, found guilty, and the death penalty imposed.To the judgment of the supreme court of the state, affirming the sentence against him, he prosecutes this writ of error, and urges as ground thereof that § 246 is repugnant to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States in that it denies to him the equal protection of the laws, because it provides an exceptional punishment for life prisoners.

The supreme court sustained the law on the ground that there was a proper basis for classification between convicts serving life sentences in the state prison, as defendant was when he committed the crime for which he was indicted and found guilty, and convicts serving lesser terms.

It is elementary that the contention is to be tested by considering whether there is a basis for the classification made by the statute.Applying that test, we see no error in the ruling.As said by Mr....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Oyama v. State of California
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 19, 1948
    ...must carry the burden of showing that it does not rest upon any reasonable basis, but is essentially arbitrary.' Finley v. California, 222 U.S. 28, 32 S.Ct. 13, 56 L.Ed. 75. ...
  • People v. Dorado
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • January 29, 1965
    ...Cal.2d 330, 334-337, 202 P.2d 53; People v. Finley (1908), 153 Cal. 59, 62, 94 P. 248, affirmed in Finley v. Peope of State of California (1911), 222 U.S. 28, 31, 32 S.Ct. 13, 56 L.Ed. 75.) Defendant urges that this court should change the above rule because of the adoption of the indetermi......
  • Vandalia Railroad Co. v. Stillwell
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1914
    ... ... article 1 of the State Constitution, that it makes employers ... of five or more ... 671, 80 ... N.E. 529, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 418; People, ex rel ... v. Butler St. Foundry, etc., Co. (1903), ... 215, Ann. Cas. 1913 B 1349; Murphy v ... California (1912), 225 U.S. 623, 32 S.Ct. 697, 56 ... L.Ed. 1229, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 153; Finley v ... California (1911), 222 U.S. 28, 32 S.Ct. 13, 56 ... ...
  • Vandalia R. Co. v. Stilwell
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1914
    ...1349;Murphy v. California (1912) 225 U. S. 623, 32 Sup. Ct. 697, 56 L. Ed. 1229, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 153;Finley v. California (1911) 222 U. S. 28, 32 Sup. Ct. 13, 56 L. Ed. 75;Chesapeake, etc., Co. v. Conley (1913) 230 U. S. 513, 33 Sup. Ct. 985, 57 L. Ed. 1597;Chicago, etc., Co. v. Fraley ......
  • Get Started for Free