James Williams, Plaintiff In Error v. the United States, Defendants In Error
Decision Date | 01 January 1843 |
Citation | 1 How. 290,11 L.Ed. 135,42 U.S. 290 |
Parties | JAMES WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial20 cases
-
Myers v. United States
...Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 498, 513, 10 L. Ed. 264; United States v. Eliason, 16 Pet. 291, 302, 10 L. Ed. 968; Williams v. United States, 1 How. 290, 297, 11 L. Ed. 135; Cunningham v. Neagle, 135 U. S. 1, 63, 10 S. Ct. 658, 34 L. Ed. 55; Russell Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 514, 523, 43 ......
-
Mistretta v. United States United States v. Mistretta
...powers, with full effect of law, in his place. See, e.g., Wolsey v. Chapman, 101 U.S. 755, 25 L.Ed. 915 (1880); Williams v. United States, 1 How. 290, 11 L.Ed. 135 (1843). It is already a leap from the proposition that a person who is not the President may exercise executive powers to the p......
-
Lajoie v. Milliken
...the President could not attend in person to the execution of the Lever Act and must act through representatives. Williams v. United States, 1 How. 290, 297, 11 L. Ed. 135;Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 498, 513, 10 L. Ed. 264;United States v. Weeks, 258 U. S. --, 42 Sup. Ct. 505, 66 L. Ed. 965;......
-
Collins v. Mnuchin
...L.Ed.2d 714 (1989) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Wolsey v. Chapman , 101 U.S. 755, 25 L.Ed. 915 (1880) ; Williams v. United States , 42 U.S. (1 How.) 290, 11 L.Ed. 135 (1843) ) ("Although the Constitution says that ‘[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United State......
Request a trial to view additional results