Jametsky v. Olsen
Docket Number | 88215-1 |
Decision Date | 06 February 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
226 cases
-
Associated Press v. Washington State Legislature
...PRA from" the CDC and argue that the 2007 amendment " ‘cannot be viewed as accidental.’ " Id. at 22, 25 (quoting Jametsky v. Olsen, 179 Wash.2d 756, 766, 317 P.3d 1003 (2014) ).¶ 20 Because the meaning of "agency" as pertains to individual legislators’ offices is plain, the Legislative Defe......
-
Snohomish Cnty. v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.
...of the pertinent statutory language. Statutory interpretation is a matter of law that we review de novo. Jametsky v. Olsen, 179 Wash.2d 756, 761, 317 P.3d 1003 (2014).¶ 22 The goal of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 762, 317 P.3d ......
-
SEIU Healthcare 775NW v. State
...Construction of RCW 42.56.070(9) ¶ 49 Statutory interpretation is a matter of law that we review de novo. Jametsky v. Olsen, 179 Wash.2d 756, 761, 317 P.3d 1003 (2014). The primary goal of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 762, 317 ......
-
Wrigley v. State
...of the provision in question, the context of the statute in which the provision is found, and related statutes. Jametsky v. Olsen , 179 Wash.2d 756, 762, 317 P.3d 1003 (2014) ; Campbell & Gwinn , 146 Wash.2d at 10, 43 P.3d 4. "Legislative definitions provided in a statute are controlling, b......
Request a trial to view additional results