Jane Doe v. Board of Elections, 61 September Term, 2008.
| Decision Date | 09 September 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 61 September Term, 2008.,61 September Term, 2008. |
| Citation | 406 Md. 110,956 A.2d 199 |
| Parties | Jane DOE, et al. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. |
| Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County pursuant to certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals; Robert A. Greenberg, Judge.
Jonathan S. Shurberg (Jonathan S. Shurberg, P.C., Silver Spring, MD; Joseph S. Kakesh of Arnold & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC; Susan L. Sommer and Natalie M. Chinof, Lamda Legal Defense and Ed. Fund, Inc., New York City), all on brief, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Brief of Public Justice Center, Casa De Maryland, and Maryland Disability Law Center as Amici Curiae for Appellants/Cross-Appellees: Gregory P. Care, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr., Appellate Advocacy Fellow, Public Justice Center, Baltimore, MD.
Kevin Karpinski (Victoria M. Shearer of Karpinski, Colaresi & Karp, P.A., Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Brief of Amicus Curiae, Maryland Citizens for a Responsible Government Corp., Supporting Appellee/Cross-Appellant: John R. Garza, Rockville, MD; Benjamin W. Bull, Brian W. Raum, Austin R. Nimocks, Amy Smith, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ.
ARGUED BY BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, ADKINS and BARBERA, JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER.
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 9th day of September, 2008,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the matter remanded to the circuit court with directions to enter judgment in favor of Appellants. Costs to be paid by the Appellee. Mandate to issue forthwith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People's Counsel v. Loyola
... ... No. 137 September Term, 2007 ... Court of Appeals of Maryland ... September 9, 2008 ... [956 A.2d 167] ... Peter ... ") 3 appealed to the Baltimore County Board of Appeals (Board of Appeals). 4 The Board of ... ...
-
Doe v. Board of Elections
...enter judgment in favor of Appellants. Costs to be paid by the Appellee. Mandate to issue forthwith. Doe v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, 406 Md. 110, 111, 956 A.2d 199, 200 (2008). 13. We need not address the Circuit Court's denial of Jane Doe's Cross-Motion for Summary 14. Marylan......
-
Clarksville Residents Against Mortuary Def. Fund, Inc. v. Donaldson Props.
... ... DONALDSON PROPERTIES et al. No. 70, Sept. Term, 2016 Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 22, 2017 ... 522 We consider whether the Howard County Board of Appeals ("the Board") erred in approving a ... , the circuit court issued an order on September 15, 2014, affirming the Board's decision. The ... , 406 Md. 54, 66, 956 A.2d 166, 173 (2008) (quoting People's Counsel for Balt. County v ... ...
-
Attar v. DMS Tollgate, LLC
... ... v. DMS TOLLGATE, LLC, et al. No. 12 Sept. Term 2016 Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 23, ... 2 The Protestants appealed to the Board of Appeals for Baltimore County ("the Board"), ... 54, [956 A.2d 166] (2008). We conclude that the Board's description of the ... ...