Janssen v. Tusha

Citation271 N.W. 823,65 S.D. 124
Decision Date15 March 1937
Docket Number7992,7993.
PartiesJohn D. JANSSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lena TUSHA, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Anna D. Janssen (also known as Anna Janssen), Deceased; Gertie Ackkerman, Martha Foikerts, Anna Osterloo, Lena Tusha, Sarah Dahlman, Hattie Schoeneich, Weye Bunger, Sr., Diedrich Bunger (also known as Dick Bunger), Weye Bunger, Jr., Henry Bunger, Marie Fluth, Anna Lubber, Tena Terveen, Defendants and Respondents, J. J. Hofer, E. E. Wagner, I. A. Payne, F. C. Richards, W. J. Maytum, Farmers State Bank of Emery, South Dakota (an Insolvent State Banking Corporation), and Leo Schroeder, as Liquidating Agent Thereof, Dick D. Janssen, Sander D. Janssen, Hannah Janssen, Idah Janssen, Additional Defendants, and Anna D. Janssen, Impleaded Co-defendant. Dick D. JANSSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lena TUSHA, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Anna D. Janssen (also known as Anna Janssen), Deceased; Gertie Ackkerman, Martha Folkerts, Anna Osterloo, Lena Tusha, Sarah Dahlman, Hattie Schoeneich, Weye Bunger, Sr., Diedrich Bunger (also known as Dick Bunger), Weye Bunger, Jr., Henry Bunger, Marie Fluth, Anna Lubber, Tena Terveen, Defendants and Respondents, J. J. Hofer, E. E. Wagner, I. A. Payne, F. C. Richards, W. J. Maytum, Farmers State Bank of Emery, South Dakota (an Insolvent State Banking Corporation), and Leo Schroeder, as Liquidating Agent Thereof, John D. Janssen, Sander D. Janssen, Hannah Janssen, Idah Janssen, Additional Defendants, and Lida Janssen, Impleaded Co-defendant.
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

Appeals from Circuit Court, McCook County; L. L. Fleeger, Judge.

H. Van Ruschen and C. H. McCay, both of Salem, for appellants.

Herman Bleeker, of Alexandria, and Roscoe Satterlee, of Mitchell for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

John D Janssen and Dick D. Janssen brought separate actions to quiet title to tracts of land in McCook county. The complaints are in the usual statutory form alleging that the defendants claim to have some right, title, or interest in and to the property described therein adverse to the plaintiffs. The defendants interposed in each case an answer and counterclaim. Demurrers thereto were overruled, and plaintiffs have appealed.

We have carefully considered the grounds urged by the demurrers and are of the opinion that the learned trial court ruled correctly and that the contentions of appellants are without merit.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT