Jarvis Clark Co. v. United States, Court No. 81-9-01163.

Decision Date02 May 1983
Docket NumberCourt No. 81-9-01163.
Citation566 F. Supp. 344
PartiesJARVIS CLARK CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.
CourtU.S. Court of International Trade

Glad, White & Ferguson, Los Angeles, Cal. (Edward N. Glad, Los Angeles, Cal., on memorandum brief), for plaintiff.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Joseph I. Liebman, New York City, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch (Michael P. Maxwell, New York City, on memorandum brief), for defendant.

FORD, Judge:

This action is before the court on plaintiff's motion and defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the rules of this court. Plaintiff has abandoned all claims as to all merchandise other than the "tippler hoppers". The merchandise was classified within the provisions of Item 690.15, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as other cars not self-propelled under the superior heading "railroad and railway rolling stock" and, as such, assessed with duty at 18 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends the imported merchandise is properly subject to classification under Item 664.08, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 4707 as "* * * other excavating * * * and extracting machinery * * * whether stationary or mobile, for earth, minerals, or ores * * *" and, as such, subject to duty at 4.7 percent ad valorem or 4.4 percent ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry.

The pertinent statutory provisions involved herein provide as follows:

690.15 Railroad and railway rolling stock: Passenger, baggage, mail, freight and other cars, not self-propelled
Mechanical shovels, coalcutters, scrapers, bulldozers, and other excavating, levelling, boring, and extracting machinery, all the foregoing, whether stationary or mobile, for earth, minerals, or ores; pile drivers; snow plows, not self-propelled; all the foregoing and parts thereof:
* * * * * *
664.08 Other

The parties have agreed the following facts are not in dispute:

1. Only the "tippler hoppers" in entries 274883, 324007, 325660 and 326919, covered by the above entitled action, were classified under Item 690.15, TSUS, as railroad and railway rolling stock.

2. The tippler hoppers are designed for and used only to haul earth, minerals, or ores out of underground mines.

3. The said tippler hoppers run on rails laid in underground mines.

4. The tippler hoppers are not self-propelled.

5. The standard gauge for railroad and railway rolling stock in the United States is 4 feet 8½ inches.

6. The gauge of the tippler hoppers imported by plaintiff is either 20 inches, 30 inches, or 36 inches.

7. The tippler hoppers imported by plaintiff are not equipped with brakes and do not conform to all safety standards promulgated for railroad cars.

Based upon the foregoing facts it is the position of plaintiff that the imported merchandise does not fall within the common meaning of railroad or railway rolling stock, nor is it ejusdem generis with such phraseology. Defendant contends the cars are not excavating or extracting machinery as claimed.

It is apparent, based upon paragraph 2 of the agreed facts, the sales brochure attached to plaintiff's motion, as well as the affidavit of James Lloyd Stevens also attached to said motion, that the cars are used to transport ore and are not excavating or extracting machinery. Mr. Steven's affidavit states:

That the mining trucks involved herein are sold and used by private corporations solely as a transportation vehicle for ores and waste in underground mining.

Examination of the tariff classification study...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Jarvis Clark Co. v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • 2 d3 Maio d3 1984
    ...the date of importation. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court held in favor of the government. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United States, 566 F.Supp. 344 (C.I.T.1983). The court did not consider the correctness of the government's classification. Instead, it found the plaintiff's ......
  • Weinberger v. PIEDMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 8 d5 Julho d5 1983
    ... ... No. 80 Civ. 5143 (JES) ... United States District Court, S.D. New York ... July 8, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT