Jason v. Fonda

Citation698 F.2d 966
Decision Date01 December 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-5973,81-5973
Parties, 1983 Copr.L.Dec. P 25,498 Sonya JASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane FONDA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

Sonya Jason, in pro. per.

Ronald S. Rosen, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before ANDERSON, PREGERSON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Sonya Jason brought an action against Jane Fonda and eight other defendants for copyright infringement, unfair competition, misappropriation, and breach of implied contract. Mrs. Jason's primary allegation was that the defendants' motion picture, Coming Home, infringed on the copyright in her novel, Concomitant Soldier--Woman and War. The district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the other claims. We affirm.

Our review of the facts and issues leads us to concur in the well-reasoned decision of Judge Kelleher filed September 21, 1981. 526 F.Supp. 774 (C.D.Cal.1982). We therefore incorporate his memorandum of decision by reference. Judge Kelleher aptly points out:

(1) Mrs. Jason presented evidence showing no more than a "bare possibility" the defendants had access to her work. Such a showing is insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact. See British Airways Board v. Boeing Company, 585 F.2d 946, 952 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 [99 S.Ct. 1790, 60 L.Ed.2d 241] (1979);

(2) Even assuming access, there was no substantial similarity between the two works under the standards announced by this court in Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 562 F.2d 1157 (9th Cir.1977); and

(3) It is proper to dismiss pendent state claims when the federal claim is dismissed prior to trial. Wham-O Mfg. Co. v. Paradise Manufacturing Co., 327 F.2d 748, 753 (9th Cir.1964); see also, Wren v. Sletten Construction Co., 654 F.2d 529, 536 (9th Cir.1981).

Additionally, Judge Kelleher did not abuse his discretion in handling discovery nor in denying Mrs. Jason's motion for reconsideration.

The appellees' request for sanctions and attorney's fees is denied. Single costs are allowed.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
47 cases
  • Scott v. Henrich
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Montana
    • November 17, 1988
    ...with evidence which would preclude a directed verdict for the officers. See, See v. Durang, 711 F.2d 141 (9th Cir.1983); Jason v. Fonda, 698 F.2d 966 (9th Cir.1982). Scott has the burden to come forward with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).......
  • Stewart v. Wachowski
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • June 14, 2005
    ...California bookstores "creates no more than a `bare possibility' that defendants may have had access to plaintiffs book"), aff'd., 698 F.2d 966 (9th Cir.1982). a. The Terminator Defendants The Terminator The Terminator Defendants concede that Fox had access to Stewart's protected works in t......
  • Cain v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • June 6, 2016
    ...to establish a reasonable possibility of success for purposes of Rule 56. See, e.g., Art Attacks, 581 F.3d at 1144; Jason v. Fonda, 698 F.2d 966, 967 (9th Cir. 1982). In the end, she has pointed to an online address, but that alone will not do, regardless of how similar the two works of ver......
  • Professional Managers, Inc. v. Fawer, Brian, Hardy & Zatzkis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • September 10, 1986
    ...See, e.g., Southard v. Forbes, Inc. 588 F.2d 140, 145 (5th Cir.1979); See v. Durang, 711 F.2d 141 (9th Cir.1983); Jason v. Fonda, 698 F.2d 966, 967 (9th Cir.1982); THI-Hawaii v. First Commerce Fin. Corp., 627 F.2d 991, 993-94 (9th Cir.1980); Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc., 612 F.2d 604, 61......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT