Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger
Decision Date | 22 May 1934 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 573. |
Citation | 26 Ala.App. 191,157 So. 231 |
Parties | JASPER LAND CO. v. RIDDLESPERGER. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied June 12, 1934.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; Ernest Lacy, Judge.
Garnishment suit by Mrs. Vannah Riddlesperger against A. S. Preston defendant; Jasper Land Company, garnishee. From a judgment for plaintiff, the garnishee appeals.
Affirmed.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Jasper Land Co. v Riddlesperger (6 Div. 613) 157 So. 233.
See also, 140 So. 624, 25 Ala. App. 45.
Coleman D. Shepherd, of Jasper, for appellant.
L. D. Gray and J. B. Powell, both of Jasper for appellee.
The record discloses that appellee recovered judgment against A. S. Preston, defendant in the court below, for $550, on September 22, 1928.
On January 31, 1931, garnishment was issued on the judgment against this appellant, who answered "not indebted." This answer was contested, and upon the trial of the contest before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of this appellee against this appellant for the full amount of the plaintiff's judgment, and the garnishee appealed. The action of the court in rendering this judgment is made the basis of the assignment of errors.
The trial judge in the rendition of the judgment, among other things, states:
Appellant admits that Preston, the judgment debtor, has been for many years continuously in its employ, and has received appreciable salary for his services; but contends that at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment Preston was working for it under a certain contract entered into by and between L. B. Musgrove, deceased, its former president, and Preston, on August 22, 1927. Said contract appears in the record and is as follows:
Appellant predicates its nonliability upon the foregoing contract alone, and in effect concedes that but for this contract the plaintiff would be entitled to her judgment in this proceeding. In this connection it is insisted that at no time during the pertinent period, that is to say, from the date of the service of garnishment to the time of the trial of this...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Calvert v. State, 8 Div. 928.
-
EQUILEASE CORPORATION v. SOLID WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., Civ. A. No. 73-G-267-S.
...basis to an advance basis is void for the failure of a resolution of the Board of Directors, relying primarily on Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger, 26 Ala.App. 191, 157 So. 231. The Court makes no determination, at this time, of the claim of the Plaintiff that the acts of the Defendant and ......
- Jasper Land Co. v. Riddlesperger, 6 Div. 613.