Jay Fox v. State of Washington
Decision Date | 23 February 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 134,134 |
Citation | 236 U.S. 273,59 L.Ed. 573,35 S.Ct. 383 |
Parties | JAY FOX, Plff. in Err., v. STATE OF WASHINGTON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Gilbert E. Roe for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 274 intentionally omitted] Mr. W. V. Tanner, Attorney General of Washington, and Mr. Fred G. Remann, for defendant in error.
This is an information for editing printed matter tending to encourage and advocate disrespect for law, contrary to a statute of Washington. The statute is as follows: 'Every person who shall wilfully print, publish, edit, issue, or knowingly circulate, sell, distribute or display any book, paper, document, or written or printed matter, in any form, advocating, encouraging or inciting, or having a tendency to encourage or incite the commission of any crime, breach of the peace, or act of violence, or which shall tend to encourage or advocate disrespect for law or for any court or courts of justice, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor;' Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2564. The defendant demurred on the ground that the act was unconstitutional. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant was tried and convicted. 71 Wash. 185, 127 Pac. 1111. With regard to the jurisdiction of this court, it should be observed that the supreme court of the state, while affirming that the Constitution of the United States guarantees freedom of speech, held not only that the act was valid in that respect, but also that it was not bad for uncertainty, citing Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, so that we gather that the Constitution of the United States, and especially the 14th Amendment, was relied upon, apart from the certificate of the chief justice to that effect.
The printed matter in question is an article entitled, 'The Nude and the Prudes,' reciting in its earlier part that 'Home is a community of free spirits, who came out into the woods to escape the polluted atmosphere of priest-ridden, conventional society;' that 'one of the liberties enjoyed by the Homeites was the privilege to bathe in evening dress, or with merely the clothes nature gave them, just as they chose;' but that 'eventually a few prudes got into the community and proceeded in the brutal, unneighborly way of the outside world to suppress the people's freedom,' and that they had four persons arrested on the charge of indecent exposure, followed in two cases, it seems, by sentences to imprisonment. 'And the perpetrators of this vile action wonder why they are being boycotted.' It goes on: It then predicts and encourages the boycott of those who thus interfere with...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Whitney v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco
...U.S. 396, 50 S.Ct. 167, 71 L.Ed. 508; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 45 S.Ct. 141, 96 L.Ed. 402; Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273, 35 S.Ct. 383, 59 L.Ed. 573; Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 33 S.Ct. 780, 57 L.Ed. 1232. [Footnote 'In summary, then, we hold that these st......
-
Vogel v. Los Angeles County
...read to avoid raising difficult constitutional problems which any other application would present. Fox v. State of Washington, 1915, 236 U.S. 273, 277, 35 S.Ct. 383, 384, 59 L.Ed. 573 (575). It appears from correspondence of record between the city and petitioners that although the city wel......
-
Katzev v. County of Los Angeles
...carefully drawn so as not unduly to impair liberty of expression, is not too vague for a criminal law. Cf. Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273, 277, 35 S.Ct. 383, 384, 59 L.Ed. 573, .' We have such a statute at The trial judge correctly concluded that County Ordinance 6633 is valid. Judgment af......
-
State v. Casselman, 7502
...P. 243, 32 L.R.A.,N.S., 505; State v. Lawrence, 9 Okl.Cr. 16, 130 P. 508; State v. Fox, 71 Wash. 185, 127 P. 1111; affirmed: 236 U.S. 273, 59 L.Ed. 573, 35 S.Ct. 383. is no absolute right to picket, even when done without violence, as an incident to freedom of speech as guaranteed under the......
-
"THIS WEARISOME ANALYSIS": THE CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TEST FROM SCHENCK TO BRANDENBURG.
...interference with either," which at least suggests that due process might protect other interests. Id. at 17. Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273 (1915), is a puzzling citation since there was no mention of the First Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment in the lower court opinion by the Washin......
-
Critics of "free speech" and the uses of the past.
...v. Colorado, 205 U.S. 454, 462 (1907). (111.) Commonwealth v. Karvonen, 106 N.E. 556, 557 (Mass. 1914). (112.) Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273, 276-277 (1915); see Schenck, 249 U.S.47; Debs, 249 U.S. 211. (113.) Michael Kent Curtis, 89 Nw. U. L. Rev. at - (cited in note 22). (114.) Id. (115......
-
Papers, please: does the constitution permit the states a role in immigration enforcement?
...(quoting Hooper v. California, 155 U.S. 648, 657 (1895)). (75.) Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 64, 118 (1804). (76.) 236 U.S. 273, 277 (1915) (citing United States ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Del. & Hudson Co., 213 U.S. 366, 407-08 (1909)). (77.) United States v. Ariz......