Jayson W. Davison Trust of 2010, v. Brockhaus, 113,175.
Decision Date | 26 August 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 113,175.,113,175. |
Citation | 366 P.3d 1159 |
Parties | The JAYSON W. DAVISON TRUST OF 2010, u/t/a 7/8/10 and Jayson W. Davison, Trustee, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Pat BROCKHAUS, Defendant/Appellee, and Don Wayne Brockhaus, Successor Trustee of the Arthur J. Brockhaus Trust, u/t/a 4/1/1994, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Logan County Treasurer, Third Party Defendant/Appellee. |
Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma |
Paul Streck, Streck & Associates, Edmond, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Kraettli Q. Epperson, Sara K. Hawkins, Mee Mee Hoge & Epperson PLLP, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee and Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff/Appellee.
¶ 1 The Jayson W. Davison Trust of 2010, u/t/a 7/8/10, and Jayson W. Davison, Trustee, appeal the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and Third–Party Plaintiff, Don Wayne Brockhaus, Successor Trustee of the Arthur J. Brockhaus Trust, u/t/a 4/1/1994. The primary issue on appeal is whether Don Brockhaus, as successor trustee, received the required notice of the tax sale of certain real property in Guthrie, Oklahoma. This appeal was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp. 2014, ch. 15, app. 1, without appellate briefing. After review, we affirm.
¶ 2 Jayson W. Davison, as trustee as of the Jayson W. Davison Trust of 2010, u/t/a 7/8/10 (Davison), filed an affidavit for forcible entry and detainer in small claims court in July 2012, alleging he is the owner of property at 708 Meadow Rock Trail, Guthrie, Oklahoma. Davison obtained the property on June 11, 2012, through a County Treasurer's resale deed, and placed the property in the Jayson W. Davison Trust of 2010 (Davison Trust) through a quit claim deed dated June 26, 2012. Pat Brockhaus was named as the defendant. Davison seeks possession of the property, alleging Brockhaus lives on the property and is wrongfully in possession of it.
¶ 3 Brockhaus asked that the case be dismissed because it was brought as an eviction proceeding and because he claims an ownership interest in the property, the proper action is one in ejectment. Brockhaus further alleged the Logan County Treasurer failed to obtain proper service and or to give proper notice of the tax resale of the property. The case was transferred from the small claims division to the civil division docket on October 25, 2012.
¶ 4 Davison filed a motion for summary judgment, and in his brief in support of the motion, he alleged as undisputed the facts summarized and quoted below. We have included Brockhaus's response to each statement of undisputed fact.
¶ 5 Pat Brockhaus filed a supplemental answer, which also contained counterclaims and a third-party petition. The filing added Don Wayne Brockhaus, Successor Trustee of the Arthur J. Brockhaus Trust, u/t/a 4/1/1994 (Brockhaus Trust), as a third-party plaintiff, and added the Logan County Treasurer (Treasurer) as a third-party defendant. Pat and Brockhaus Trust alleged Brockhaus Trust owns Property and that Treasurer conducted a tax sale at which Treasurer purported to sell Property. They asserted Brockhaus Trust was not served with proper notice before the tax sale. They alleged the document that was sent was directed to " ‘Brockhaus, Arthur J. Trust c/o Glyna Noe, 10312 Park Road, Edmond, OK 73034–000 ’ not Don Wayne Brockhaus at 10907 Magnolia Blvd., Suite 467, North Hollywood, CA 91601, who is the Trustee of the Trust." Pat and Brockhaus Trust alleged Glyna Noe is not the trustee or successor trustee of this Trust. They further alleged the notice did not contain "the amount of all delinquent taxes, costs, penalties and interest accrued, due and unpaid as required by 68 O.S. § 3127." The mail sent to the Edmond address was returned unclaimed. No notice was sent to Don Wayne Brockhaus as Successor Trustee or to Pat Brockhaus at Property.
¶ 6 Pat and Brockhaus Trust asserted affirmative defenses of negligence on the part of Davison Trust or Treasurer, that Davison Trust's allegations are not well grounded in fact or law and are not warranted by existing law or by good faith extension of existing law, and that Davison Trust failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. Pat and Brockhaus Trust alleged claims against Davison Trust for quiet title, trespass, and unjust enrichment.
¶ 7 The trial court overruled Davison Trust's motion for summary judgment. Pat and Brockhaus Trust filed a "motion for leave of the court to amend their counterclaims and complaint of defendant and third party plaintiff and petition of third party plaintiff." The supplemental counterclaims and third-party petition sought to add seven third-party defendants involved in the sale and purchase of 5 properties at the tax sale which are allegedly owned by Brockhaus Trust. Davison Trust objected to the motion for leave to amend. The trial court denied Pat's and Brockhaus Trust's motion for leave to amend and granted Davison Trust's motion to enter on the non-jury docket.
¶ 8 Brockhaus Trust then filed a motion for summary judgment asserting the following as uncontroverted facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial