Jefferson Life & Cas. Co. v. Bevill
| Decision Date | 22 March 1956 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 859 |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Parties | JEFFERSON LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. Lillian R. BEVILL. |
Clark E. Johnson, Jr., Albertville, for petitioner.
H. H. Conway, Albertville, opposed.
This cause is here on petition by Jefferson Life & Casualty Company, a corporation, for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the opinion and judgment of that court in the case of Jefferson Life & Casualty Co. v. Bevill.
Petitioner argues strenuously that its demurrer was sustained to the entire complaint and inasmuch as the plaintiff in the trial court thereafter failed or refused to amend her complaint there was no complaint to sustain the judgment and, hence, the Court of Appeals erred in not reversing the judgment of the trial court.
The case of Seymour v. Day, 207 Ala. 60, 91 So. 875, cited by petitioner, clearly holds that there can be no judgment for a plaintiff without a complaint to support that judgment. See Box v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 232 Ala. 1, 168 So. 216.
The judgment entry as it relates to the trial court's action on the demurrer filed to the original complaint and on the demurrer interposed after the complaint was amended 'to the complaint and each count thereof both separately and severally' is not as clear as might be desired. However, we are of the opinion that the judgment sufficiently shows that the demurrer was not sustained to the original complaint but was sustained to the amendment thereto. We have said that an obscure judgment may be upheld if its intention is made clear by reference to the pleadings and to the proceedings. Coffey v. Cross, 185 Ala. 86, 64 So. 95. And it has been said that a judgment entry must be construed in all of its parts in reference to the pleading to which it refers. Doss v. Wadsworth Red Ash Coal Co., 185 Ala. 597, 64 So. 341. See State Tax Commission v. Commercial Realty Co., 236 Ala. 358, 182 So. 31; Taunton v. Dobbs, 240 Ala. 287, 199 So. 9; Floyd v. Jackson, 26 Ala.App. 575, 164 So. 121; Peppers v. Agee Mercantile Co., 25 Ala.App. 548, 149 So. 876. We do not mean to indicate that the cases just cited deal with questions exactly similar to the one at hand. However, the rule of those cases to the effect that the judgment entry must be construed in all of its parts does have application here and we think leads to the construction which we have placed on the judgment of the trial court on the demurrers to the complaint.
Petitioner also complains of the holding of the Court of Appeals to the effect that plaintiff was entitled to the benefits of the policy sued on where her 'disease' did not manifest itself within six months of the date of the issuance of the policy, although the medical cause of the disease may have existed prior to such time.
The conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals in this connection is in accord with the holding of that court in the case of National Casualty Co. v. Hudson, 32 Ala.App. 69, 21 So.2d 568, as well as with the authorities generally throughout the country, including those cited in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
In 45 C.J.S., Insurance, § 893, p. 971, it is stated that clauses like the one with which we are here concerned are strictly construed against the insurance company and that illness or disability...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Southards v. Central Plains Ins. Co.
...the issuance of the policy. See Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n v. Patton, 37 F.Supp. 48 (E.D.Ky.). Cf. Jefferson Life & Cas. Co. v. Bevill, 264 Ala. 206, 86 So.2d 292; Cohen v. North Am. Life & Cas. Co., 150 Minn. 507, 185 N.W. 939; Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Lyle, 288 P.2d 717, 53 A.L.R.......
-
United Sec. Life Ins. Co. v. Moore
...cert. den. 272 Ala. 710, 128 So.2d 741; Jefferson Life & Casualty Company v. Bevill, 38 Ala.App. 384, 86 So.2d 289(4), cert. den. 264 Ala. 206, 86 So.2d 292(4); National Casualty Company v. Hudson, 32 Ala.App. 69, 21 So.2d 568(4); 53 A.L.R.2d 686. The provision of such origination must be s......
-
United Sec. Life Ins. Co. v. Sikes
...Cir., 121 F. 732, 61 L.R.A. 500.' National Casualty Co. v. Hudson, 32 Ala.App. 69, 21 So.2d 568, 570. See also Jefferson Life & Casualty Co. v. Bevill, 264 Ala. 206, 86 So.2d 292; National Security Ins. Co. of Elba, Ala. v. Tellis, 39 Ala.App. 455, 104 So.2d In World Insurance Company of Om......
-
Blue Cross-Blue Shield v. Nelson
... ... " See Jefferson Life and Casualty Co. v. Bevill, 38 Ala.App. 384, 86 So.2d 289, where the ... ...