Jefferson v. Hall

Decision Date12 June 2009
Docket NumberNo. 07-12502.,07-12502.
CitationJefferson v. Hall, 570 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2009)
PartiesLawrence Joseph JEFFERSON, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Warden Hilton HALL, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

John R. Martin(Court-Appointed), Martin Brothers, P.C., Jeffrey Lyn Ertel, Suzanne Kay Hashimi, Fed. Public Defenders, Fed. Defender Program, Inc., Atlanta, GA, for Jefferson.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

In this capital case, the Warden of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison, Hilton Hall("Hall"), appeals from the district court's order granting in part Lawrence Joseph Jefferson's ("Jefferson")petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.The district court granted relief on Jefferson's claim that his trial counsel were constitutionally ineffective during the penalty phase of the trial, holding that the Petitioner's trial counsel performed deficiently when they failed to conduct a reasonable investigation of mitigating evidence and failed to present in particular certain mental health evidence.Petitioner Jefferson, in turn, has cross-appealed from the district court's denial of Jefferson's claim that he was denied a fundamentally fair trial and reliable sentencing proceeding because jurors impermissibly considered extra-judicial evidence — the Bible — during their deliberations, in violation of the Constitution.

After thorough review we affirm in part and reverse in part.Applying the law to the record before us, we hold that Jefferson's counsel were not constitutionally ineffective in preparing for the penalty phase of his trial.In addition, we can discern no merit in Jefferson's claim on cross-appeal, and agree with the district court that Jefferson was not denied a fundamentally fair trial when one juror allegedly read from a Bible in the jury room during deliberations.Accordingly, we reverse the district court's order granting relief, and remand with instructions to reinstate Jefferson's original sentence.

I.Facts and Procedural History
A.The Guilt Phase of Jefferson's Trial

The facts of the murder, as elicited from the trial testimony and not disputed here, are these.On May 2, 1985, the body of the victim, Edward Taulbee, was spotted lying in the woods near Lake Allatoona by two men driving along the highway.Ex. 20at 217-18, 227-28.Responding to the report, the Cobb County Police found Taulbee's body face down in the underbrush.Ex. 20at 235-36.Taulbee was dressed in a yellow shirt, overalls, and boots.Ex. 20at 219, 229, 235.A large log with blood on it was lying across Taulbee's head.Ex. 20at 220, 229, 236.Near the body, the police found two sticks or clubs, and one of the sticks, which later was determined to have some of Taulbee's blood and hair on it, appeared to have been shattered in several places.Ex. 21at 270-71;Ex. 23at 802.The police observed that Taulbee's head had been driven into the ground, apparently by the force of the log.Ex. 21at 274-75.

An autopsy revealed that Taulbee suffered approximately two lacerations above his left eyebrow, one laceration above his forehead, one laceration above his right ear, and five lacerations on the back of his scalp.Ex. 23at 822.Taulbee also had several fractured teeth, an abrasion across his face, an abrasion across his back, skull fractures, brain bruises, and brain hemorrhaging.Ex. 23at 822-24.The medical examiner opined that Taulbee's injuries were consistent with those caused by being struck with the wooden sticks or clubs found near his body, that Taulbee was probably knocked to the ground by the blows to his head, and that the log was then dropped on Taulbee's head, driving his face into the ground.Ex. 23at 822, 828-29, 831-32.The medical examiner further opined that these head and brain injuries caused Taulbee's death, which occurred some time on May 1, 1985, between 5:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Ex. 23at 833-35.On cross-examination, the medical examiner said that Taulbee probably did not struggle significantly, and that death "most probably" was instantaneous.Ex. 23at 837-39.

The medical examiner did not find a wallet on Taulbee's body, but the victim did have a still-ticking Timex watch, a pocket knife, and a small amount of cash on him.Ex. 21at 277;Ex. 23at 820-21, 840.Also found in Taulbee's belongings was a pay stub from Zenith Construction Company("Zenith").Ex. 21at 357-58.Upon finding the pay stub, Cobb County Police Lt.Carlton Morris telephoned the company and ascertained that the pay stub number corresponded to Taulbee.Ex. 21at 358.Brad Stewart, Zenith's construction superintendent, informed Lt. Morris that the Petitioner, Jefferson, worked with Taulbee, and upon Lt. Morris's request, Stewart and Jefferson came to the station and identified Taulbee from pictures of the body.Ex. 21at 329, 358, 374-75.

During Lt. Morris's interview with Jefferson, Jefferson said that he had seen Taulbee leave the Zenith site alone around 5:30 p.m. on the day of the murder and head north in his automobile to go fishing.Ex. 21at 376-78.Jefferson explained that he knew Taulbee was going fishing because earlier that day, Taulbee had dug up some worms to use as bait.Ex. 21at 376.Jefferson also offered that he did not join Taulbee that afternoon because "he didn't have the patience to fish."Ex. 21at 377-78.Jefferson said that after Taulbee left work, Jefferson rode his bicycle home, where he lived alone, watched television, drank beer, and stayed in that evening.Ex. 21at 378-79.

Jefferson also told the police that Taulbee had loaned him $120 that was due on May 2, 1985, the day after the murder.Ex. 21at 380.Jefferson said that he had not yet paid Taulbee because he did not receive his paycheck on May 1 from Stewart, as he had expected.Ex. 21at 380.Stewart independently informed Lt. Morris that he had given both Taulbee and Jefferson their paychecks on the day of the murder.Stewart also said that Taulbee and Jefferson had never had any money problems, and got along well with each other.Ex. 21at 322, 325-26, 383.

As Jefferson's interview progressed, Jefferson became more nervous.Ex. 21at 381.Nevertheless, Jefferson consented to a search of his apartment.Ex. 21at 381.Jefferson cooperated with the police, opening drawers and closet doors while the police searched the apartment.Ex. 21at 388. Lt. Morris did not find anything connecting Jefferson to the murder of Taulbee.Ex. 21at 312, 388-90.The police did find, however, a straw hat and sunglasses in Jefferson's closet.Ex. 22at 654.

During the investigation, the police learned that Taulbee kept money with him so that he could lend it to co-workers and others, and charge interest.Ex. 21at 383.Stewart also informed the police that Taulbee carried large sums of money on his person, and that Stewart had told him to keep it in a more secure location.Ex. 21at 323.

On May 7, 1985, while the investigation was still underway, the police spoke with Jefferson's neighbors, Rhonda Glade, her brotherRonald Glade, and Dwayne Mitchell.Ex. 21at 390.At trial, Ms. Glade testified that she saw Jefferson, Taulbee, and Mitchell talking outside of Jefferson's apartment at approximately 4:15 p.m. on the day of Taulbee's murder.Ex. 21at 400.She testified that she had seen Jefferson and Taulbee leave from Jefferson's apartment to go fishing, and later on the night of the killing, she saw Jefferson return to his apartment on foot and heard no car arrive.Ex. 21at 399-400, 408.Ms. Glade further testified that Jefferson came to her apartment on May 2, 1985, gave her an automated teller bank card (an "ATM card") and asked her to get rid of it.Ex. 21at 412, 414-15.She said that she then hid it in an air conditioning vent.Ex. 21at 417.Jefferson also gave her a fishing tackle box, which she put under her brother's bed.Ex. 21at 412.

On cross-examination, Ms. Glade admitted she had originally told the police she heard a car arrive and two doors slam when Jefferson returned home on May 1.Ex. 21at 427.She also admitted that she had told the police that she was "sure" her brother and Mitchell had not gone to the lake that night because they spent the evening of May 1, 1985 with her, even though at trial, she testified that both her brother and Mitchell had left the apartment during the course of the evening.Ex. 21at 434-36.

Ronald Glade testified that on May 1, 1985, he had gone to Jefferson's apartment at around 6:00 p.m. Ex. 21at 453.He said that Jefferson had locked the door to his apartment, although Jefferson was inside, which Glade thought was unusual.Ex. 21at 453-54.Glade further testified that Jefferson was acting funny and that his chest looked red.Ex. 21at 456-59.He testified that Jefferson had, prior to Taulbee's murder, made a statement about the money Taulbee had and how Jefferson "ought to knock him on the head," and that, after the murder, Jefferson had said that his "little fat buddy was dead."Ex. 21at 463.1Glade further testified that on the evening of May 1, 1985, Jefferson said he had lost his wallet and went out with Dwayne Mitchell to look for it, although Glade later found the wallet in Jefferson's apartment with approximately $100 in it.Ex. 21at 465, 467.

Dwayne Mitchell testified that he took Jefferson to buy marijuana and liquor on the night of May 1, 1985.Ex. 21at 499-500.He further testified that Jefferson asked him to drive Jefferson to Lake Allatoona that night, purportedly to find his wallet, which Jefferson claimed was missing.Ex. 21at 501.Mitchell said that when they arrived at Lake Allatoona, Jefferson left the car for five to ten minutes and returned with a fishing pole and a tackle box.Ex. 21at 502, 505.According to Mitchell, Jefferson discarded the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Hammond v. Hall
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • November 4, 2009
    ...question is whether his decision not to investigate it further was reasonable. See id. at 690-91, 104 S.Ct. at 2066; Jefferson v. Hall, 570 F.3d 1283, 1309 (11th Cir.2009) (holding that "Jefferson's counsel were required only to make a reasonable decision that further investigation into Jef......
  • Jefferson v. GDCP Warden
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 17, 2019
    ...1986, Lawrence Jefferson was found guilty of felony murder that occurred during the commission of an armed robbery. Jefferson v. Hall, 570 F.3d 1283, 1290 (11th Cir. 2009), cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Jefferson v. Upton, 560 U.S. 284, 130 S.Ct. 2217, 176 L.Ed.2d 1032 (2010), an......
  • James v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 25, 2010
    ...in what was happening, to ask intelligent questions and to respond intelligently to counsel's questions).”Jefferson v. Hall, 570 F.3d 1283, 1304–05 (11th Cir.2009). See also Breland v. State, 285 Ga.App. 251, 253, 648 S.E.2d 389, 391–92 (2007). “[T]here is nothing in the record to suggest t......
  • Ward v. Hall
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • January 4, 2010
    ...the claim is procedurally defaulted, Ward must establish cause and actual prejudice to excuse his default. See Jefferson v. Hall, 570 F.3d 1283, 1309 (11th Cir.2009). Ward argued in state court that the cause requirement was satisfied by the bailiff's failure to report the jury's question t......
  • Get Started for Free