Jeffries v. Moore, 147PA02.

Decision Date27 June 2002
Docket NumberNo. 147PA02.,147PA02.
Citation565 S.E.2d 665
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSharn M. JEFFRIES v. Tatjana Thomas MOORE and Carl Jonathan Moore, Jr.

Leigh A. Peek, Hillsborough, for Tatjana and Carl Moore.

John D. Loftin, Hillsborough, for Jeffries.

Prior report: 148 N.C.App. 364, 559 S.E.2d 217.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2002."

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Krawiec v. Manly
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 6, 2018
    ...(alteration in original) (quoting Dixon v. Stuart , 85 N.C. App. 338, 340, 354 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1987) ), disc. rev. denied , 355 N.C. 748, 565 S.E.2d 665 (2002). Rule 12(b)(6) "generally precludes dismissal except in those instances where the face of the complaint discloses some insurmounta......
  • Turner v. Hammocks Beach Corp.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 2008
    ...864, 561 S.E.2d 351, 353 (quoting Dixon v. Stuart, 85 N.C.App. 338, 340, 354 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1987)), disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 748, 565 S.E.2d 665 (2002). We review the trial court's ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss de novo. Leary v. N.C. Forest Prods., Inc., 157 N.C.App. 39......
  • Crouse v. Mineo
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 2008
    ...864, 561 S.E.2d 351, 353 (quoting Dixon v. Stuart, 85 N.C.App. 338, 340, 354 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1987)), disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 748, 565 S.E.2d 665 (2002). "Rule 12(b)(6) `generally precludes dismissal except in those instances where the face of the complaint discloses some insurmountab......
  • Gunn v. Simpson, Schulman & Beard, LLC
    • United States
    • Superior Court of North Carolina
    • September 23, 2011
    ...864, 561 S.E.2d 351, 353 (quoting Dixon v. Stuart, 85 N.C.App. 338, 340, 354 S.E.2d 757, 758 (1987)), disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 748, 565 S.E.2d 665 (2002). {22} The Court need not determine that the plaintiff will ultimately prevail in order to deny the motion to dismiss; it need only d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT