Jeffries v. Wood, 95-99003

Decision Date20 December 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-99003,95-99003
Citation103 F.3d 827
Parties96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9293, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,306 Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Carolyn R. Dimmick, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-90-00925-CRD.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

On August 29, 1996, the Court directed the parties to submit briefs on the question of whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("Act") applied to cases filed prior to the Act's effective date. This issue has been fully briefed and was submitted on oral argument on November 20, 1996.

A number of Ninth Circuit panels have stayed decisions pending resolution of this question. Accordingly, we have elected to announce our decision prior to issuing an opinion.

We hold that the amendments to Chapter 153 of Title 28 of the United States Code contained in Title I of the Act do not apply to cases filed in the federal courts of this Circuit prior to the Act's effective date of April 24, 1996. A full opinion detailing the rationale for our decision, along with a decision on the merits, will be forthcoming, together with any separate concurring or dissenting opinions which members of the en banc panel may wish to file.

Judges GOODWIN, BRUNETTI and HAWKINS dissent from the issuance of this order.

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 cases
  • Gretzler v. Stewart
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 30 Abril 1997
    ...104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (the "Act") applied to this appeal. That question has now been answered in the negative. See Jeffries v. Wood, 103 F.3d 827, 827 (9th Cir.1996).2 Steelman was tried separately and convicted on all counts. State v. Steelman, 120 Ariz. 301, 585 P.2d 1213 (1978), appeal......
  • Dyer v. Calderon
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 5 Mayo 1997
    ...H3305-01 (1996) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2261). The Act does not retroactively apply to Dyer's appeal. Jeffries v. Wood, 103 F.3d 827 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc). II Dyer contends that the presence of Jessica Freeland on the jury deprived him of his constitutional right to an impartial j......
  • Dyer v. Calderon
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 9 Octubre 1997
    ...H3305-01 (1996) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2261). The Act does not retroactively apply to Dyer's appeal. Jeffries v. Wood, 103 F.3d 827 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc). II Dyer contends that the presence of Jessica Freeland on the jury deprived him of his constitutional right to an impartial j......
  • Hardy v. Chappell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 11 Agosto 2016
    ...Roe , 189 F.3d 1052, 1055 (9th Cir. 1999).AEDPA applies because the petition was filed after the passage of that law. Jeffries v. Wood , 103 F.3d 827, 827 (9th Cir. 1996). Under AEDPA, relief may only be granted if the state court decision in question was either “contrary to, or involved an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT