Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Jelinek v. Costello

Document Cited authorities 140 Cited in 75 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date27 February 2003
Docket NumberNo. 97-CV-2327 (JBW).,97-CV-2327 (JBW).
Citation247 F.Supp.2d 212
PartiesRoger JELINEK, Petitioner, v. Joseph COSTELLO, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility, Respondent.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

247 F.Supp.2d 212

Roger JELINEK, Petitioner, v. Joseph COSTELLO, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility, Respondent.

No. 97-CV-2327 (JBW).

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

February 27, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Gregory Cooper Esq, New ork NY for Petitioner.

Denis Dillon District Attorney Nassau County, Mineola, NY, Tammy J. Smily Margarer E. Mainusch, Assistant District Attorney of Counsel, for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

Table of Contents 
                I.  Introduction .................................................... 224
                II. Facts ........................................................... 226
                   A. Overview ...................................................... 226
                   B. Testimony of Complaining Witnesses ............................ 226
                      1. Child J.N .................................................. 227
                         a. Charges Related to J.N .................................. 227
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of J.N ............................. 227
                         c. State Examination of J.N. at Trial....................... 229
                         d. Defense Examination of J.N. at Trial .................... 229
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Related to J.N.................. 232
                         f. Disposition of Charges Related to J.N. on Appeal......... 232
                      2. Child J.C ...................................................232
                         a. Charges Relating to J.C...................................232
                
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of J.C...............................232
                         c. State Examination of J.C. at Trial........................233
                         d. Defense Examination of J.C. at Trial......................235
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Relating to J.C..................237
                         f. Disposition on Appeal of Charges Relating to J.C..........237
                      3. Child C.H....................................................237
                         a. Charges Related to C.H....................................237
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of C.H...............................237
                         c. State Examination of C.H. at Trial........................237
                         d. Defense Examination of C.H. at Trial......................238
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Relating to C.H..................239
                         f. Disposition of Charges Related to C.H. on Appeal..........239
                      4. Child G.B....................................................239
                         a. Charges Related to G.B....................................239
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of G.B...............................239
                         c. "Vulnerable Child Witness" Hearing........................240
                         d. State Examination of G.B. at Trial........................242
                         e. Defense Examination of G.B. at Trial......................242
                         f. Jury Verdict on Charges Related to G.B....................244
                         g. Disposition of Charges Related to G.B. on Appeal..........244
                      5. Child B.D....................................................244
                         a. Charges Related to B.D....................................244
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of B.D...............................244
                         c. State Examination of B.D. at Trial........................245
                         d. Defense Examination of B.D. at Trial......................245
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Related to B.D...................246
                         f. Disposition of Charges Related to B.D. on Appeal .........246
                      6. Child P.W....................................................246
                         a. Charges Related to P.W....................................246
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of P.W...............................247
                         c. State Examination of P.W. at Trial .......................247
                         d. Defense Examination of P.W. at Trial......................247
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Related to P.W...................247
                         f. Disposition of Charges Related to P.W. on Appeal..........247
                      7. Child C.S....................................................247
                         a. Charges Related to C.S....................................247
                         b. Grand Jury Testimony of C.S...............................248
                         c. State Examination of C.S. at Trial........................248
                         d. Defense Examination of C.S. at Trial......................249
                         e. Jury Verdicts on Charges Relating to C.S..................249
                  C. Testimony of Other State Witnesses...............................249
                     1. Detective Vashti Anderson.....................................249
                     2. Child Protective Services Caseworker Daniel Speicher..........250
                     3. Parents of the Victims........................................251
                  D. Defense Case ....................................................251
                     1. Defense Fact Witnesses........................................251
                     2. Testimony of Defendant........................................251
                     3. Character Witness ............................................252
                  E. Defendant's Application to Proceed Pro Se........................252
                  F. Appointment of Standby Counsel...................................252
                  G. Summation .......................................................253
                  H. Motions at End of Case...........................................253
                  I. Verdict and Sentence.............................................253
                III.  Procedural History of Direct Appeal.............................254
                  A. Summary of Jelinek's Post-Trial Representation...................254
                  B. Direct Appeal....................................................254
                  C. Material Variance Issue in State Court...........................254
                  D. Leave to Appeal to State Court of Appeals........................255
                
                IV.  Procedural History of Initial Federal Habeas Proceedings (Filed as 97-CV-2327)
                     ................................................................ 255
                V.   Procedural History of First State Section 440 and Coram Nobis
                      Proceedings.....................................................255
                VI.  Procedural History of Recommenced Federal Habeas Proceedings
                     (Filed as 98-CV-2298)............................................256
                VII. Procedural History of Second State Section 440 and Coram Nobis
                      Proceedings.....................................................257
                VIII.Procedural History of Current Federal Habeas Proceedings (Filed as 01-CV-2566)
                     .............................................................. 258
                     A. Pleadings......................................................258
                     B. Factual Hearing................................................259
                IX.  Law...............................................................261
                     A. AEDPA Standard of Review.......................................261
                     B. Statute of Limitations.........................................261
                     C. Exhaustion ....................................................262
                     D. Procedural Bar.................................................263
                        1. In General..................................................263
                        2. Cause for the Default.......................................263
                        3. Actual Innocence............................................263
                     E. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel..............................264
                        1. In General..................................................264
                           a. Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel..................264
                           b. Ineffective Assistance of Standby Counsel................265
                           c. Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel..............266
                           d. Strategic Choices........................................267
                           e. Exhaustion of Individual Claims of Ineffectiveness.......267
                        2. Failure to Dispute Government's Variance from the Indictment..267
                        3. Failure to Object to the Sufficiency of the Evidence..........270
                        4. Failure to Call Expert Witness................................271
                        5. Failure to Call Fact and Character Witnesses..................272
                        6. Failure to Consult with Defendant.............................272
                        7. Failure to Read Rosario Material .............................273
                        8. Failure to Request a Bill of Particulars and to Move for Severance
                            of Child Endangerment Charges................................273
                        9. Failure to Object to Indirect Hearsay.........................274
                        10.Failure to Introduce Witness's Prior Inconsistent Statements into
                            Evidence.....................................................274
                        11.Failure to Object to Introduction of Defendant's Inculpatory
                            Statements...................................................275
                        12.Spillover Effect..............................................276
                    F. Confrontation Clause..............................................277
                    G. Due Process Clause................................................278
                       1. Variance from the Indictment...................................278
                       2. Admission of Uncharged Crimes Testimony into Evidence..........279
                       3. Prolonged and Suggestive Questioning of Child Witnesses by the
                           Police........................................................279
                       4. Trial Court's "Vulnerable Witness" Inquiry.....................279
                    H. Sixth Amendment Right to Notice...................................280
                    I. Discretion to Fashion Relief......................................280
                X.  Application of Law to Facts..........................................280
                    A. Timeliness........................................................280
                    B. Ineffective Assistance of Trial and Appellate Counsel.............281
                
                    1. Preliminary
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
38 cases
  • Walker v. Graham
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 2, 2013
    ...notwithstanding the failure of the applicant to exhaust the remedies available in the courts of the State.”); see Jelinek v. Costello, 247 F.Supp.2d 212, 262–63 (E.D.N.Y.2003) (discussing discretionary denial of habeas petition on the merits). Walker's ineffective assistance of appellate co......
  • Dowtin v. Cohen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • August 16, 2004
    ...misconduct); Cox v. Donnelly, 267 F.Supp.2d 418, 423-24 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) (shifting burden of proof); Jelinek v. Costello, 247 F.Supp.2d 212, 266-67 (E.D.N.Y.2003) (right to self-representation); Stewart v. Senkowski, 00-CV-0806, 03-MISC-0066 (JBW), 2003 WL 21508320, **2-3, 2003 U.S. Dist. LE......
  • United States v. Scully
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 16, 2016
    ...evidence introduced in support of the dismissed or reversed counts requires the remaining convictions to be upset.” Jelinek v. Costello, 247 F.Supp.2d 212, 276 (E.D.N.Y.2003) (citing United States v. Rooney, 37 F.3d 847, 855 (2d Cir.1994) ). Stated otherwise, “[t]he concept of prejudicial s......
  • Velazquez v. Poole
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • October 30, 2007
    ...he or she fails to consult a criminal defendant and by doing so "materially hampers the fashioning of a defense," Jelinek v. Costello, 247 F.Supp.2d 212, 273 (E.D.N.Y. 2003), this does not appear to be the case in this instance. Indeed, petitioner has not shown that counsel did not discuss ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT