Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortg. Co.
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Stephens |
| Citation | Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortg. Co., 46 S.W. 886, 19 Tex.Civ.App. 232 (Tex. App. 1898) |
| Decision Date | 02 July 1898 |
| Parties | JEMISON v. SCOTTISH-AMERICAN MORTG. CO., Limited, et al. |
Appeal from district court, Haskell county; A. H. Kirby, Special Judge.
Trespass to try title by E. S. Jemison against the Scottish-American Mortgage Company, Limited, and others. There was a judgment awarding plaintiff a portion of the land in controversy, and he appeals. Reversed.
S. W. Jones, P. D. Sanders, and Foster & Scott, for appellant. Gano, Gano & Gano, for appellees.
Appellant sued appellees to recover the north half of the James H. West survey of land, situated in Haskell county, and, failing to recover more than a small part thereof, he prosecutes this appeal. The case was tried without a jury, and without any conflict in the evidence. Appellant's statement of the material facts proven is accepted by the appellees. The decision of the case turns upon the construction of certain deeds made in November and December, 1876, by the widow and a portion of the children of A. F. James, the common source of title, who died testate March 4, 1861, to George J. Butler, whose wife was a daughter of A. F. James, deceased, and of a deed from Butler and wife to James M. Robertson, made November 7, 1885. These deeds are quoted in appellant's brief. The deeds to Butler recite a nominal consideration, and convey to him, as therein expressed, "the following property, to wit: All the right, title, and interest, legal and equitable, that we now own or possess, or that may hereafter vest in us, whether as heirs, devisees, or distributees in and to all the estate, real and personal, of A. F. James, deceased, situated and being in the state of Texas, except * * *, and except, also, whatever interest of ours in and to said estate may have heretofore been transferred or conveyed to other parties, all of which are intended to be excluded from the operation hereof; to have and to hold the same to him, the said Geo. J. Butler, his heirs and assigns, forever." The deed from Butler and wife to Robertson reads: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Fuentes v. Hirsch
...the same land as the previous unrecorded deed. 49 Tex.Jur.2d, p. 418; 59 Tex.Jur.2d 315. As stated in Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co., 19 Tex.Civ.App. 232, 46 S.W. 886 (1898) (writ ref'd): 'the registration statute which makes void as to purchasers for value and without notice a p......
-
Pacheco v. Fernandez
...known that in popular use of the word "inheritance" is included property obtained by devise or descent. Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co., 19 Tex. Civ. App. 232, 46 S. W. 886; 31 Corpus Juris, p. 1198; Dohn v. Dohn, 110 Ky. 884, 62 S. W. 1033, 64 S. W. 352; In Re White's Estate, 42 ......
-
Miller v. Pullman
...States Supreme Court, 3 Wheat. 449, 4 L. Ed. 432; Fitzgerald v. Libby, 142 Mass. 235, 7 N. E. 917, 918; Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co., 19 Tex. Civ. App. 232, 46 S. W. 886; Mills v. Pitts, 121 Tex. 196, 48 S.W.(2d) 941, by the Supreme If the plaintiff has any shadow of title to t......
-
Miles v. Martin, 3351
...Richardson v. Levi, 67 Tex. 359, 3 S.W. 444; Threadgill v. Bickerstaff, 87 Tex. 520, 29 S.W. 757, 758 and Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co., 19 Tex.Civ.App. 232, 46 S.W. 886 (Writ Miles is in no better position than his grantors, the Pratts, would have been in a contest over the sam......