Jenkins v. Riggs
Decision Date | 18 January 1905 |
Citation | 59 A. 758,100 Md. 427 |
Parties | JENKINS et al. v. RIGGS et al. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Baltimore County, in Equity; N. Charles Burke, Judge.
Suit for injunction by George C. Jenkins and others against T Dudley Riggs and others. From an order dissolving a preliminary injunction, complainants appeal. Affirmed.
Argued before McSHERRY, C.J., and BRISCOE, BOYD, PAGE, PEARCE SCHMUCKER, and JONES, JJ.
Oscar Wolff and W. Irvine Cross, for appellants.
David G. McIntosh and John I. Yellott, for appellees.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Baltimore county dissolving a preliminary injunction which had been issued to restrain the appellee, pendente lite, from obstructing a public road which crossed his farm. The material facts of the case, as they appear from the record are as follows In the year 1900 the appellee Riggs purchased a farm, with a residence and other buildings thereon, lying along the west side of the Garrison Forest Road, in the Green Spring Valley, in Baltimore county. That road runs nearly north and south, and the farm abuts on it from the Red House Road, on the north, to Stevenson's Station, on the Northern Central Railroad, on the south. At the date of Mr. Riggs' purchase, an old and much-traveled road, known as the "Green Spring Valley Road," ran in a southeasterly direction entirely across the farm near its center, separating the residence from the barn and other buildings, and extending to the Garrison Forest Road, but no further. This old road had been used by the public for more than a century, but there is no evidence that the title to its bed had ever been acquired by the county commissioners. As the old road extended easterly only to the Garrison Forest Road, persons traveling in that direction were compelled, when they reached the latter road, to go upon it either north to the Red House Road, or south to Stevenson's Station, in order to reach another road running easterly. The old road was at that time out of repair to such an extent that the roads engineer of the county expressed the opinion that it would cost about $1,800 to put in proper condition the part of it which traversed the Riggs farm. Mr. Riggs, desiring to relieve the center of his farm and buildings from the road, and being willing to furnish the land through other portions of the farm for a road or roads to be used in substitution therefor, discussed with his neighbors owning the lands in the vicinity the project of procuring the opening and construction of a new road in lieu of the old one. His advances were met in a very friendly spirit by those whom he approached, and several schemes for the location of the proposed new road were considered by him. He at first thought of opening two new roads in straight lines diagonally across the farm from the point at which the old road entered it--one to run northeasterly to the Red House Road, and the other to run southeasterly to Stevenson station, but he abandoned the plan because he came to the conclusion that it would divide the farm to a disadvantage. Before taking any formal steps toward making the change in the road, he requested the county commissioners to visit the farm and give him their views upon the subject. They went several times to the farm, and, after examining the locality, gave expression to favorable views of the proposed change of location of the road, provided there should be no objection to it from the people of the neighborhood, but they informed Mr. Riggs that he would have to proceed by petition in the usual way to have the change made. Mr. Riggs then applied to the county roads engineer to locate the new road. The engineer did as requested, and located the two new roads--one running north, and then east to the Red House Road, and the other running south, and then east to Stevenson Station, as indicated on the following plat--and laid them down on a blue-print plat of the farm:
RPT.CC.1905016547.00010
(Image Omitted)
Mr. Riggs handed the blue print thus marked by the engineer to his counsel, and they prepared from it and had published, as required by section 206 of chapter 685, p. 1086, of the Local Acts of 1900, enacting the then road law of Baltimore county, the following notice:
A formal petition, referring to this notice, and asking for closing the old road, and opening the new ones in lieu of it, as therein mentioned, was filed in due course with the county commissioners. This petition was signed by nine residents of the vicinity of the farm, among whom were two of the present appellants and the appellee. No counter petition having been filed, opposing the proposed change of roads, the county commissioners, who had become familiar with the locus in quo during their visits to the farm, did not think it expedient to appoint examiners to view the grounds and report upon the proposed change, but determined to make it as asked for in the petition, and proceeded, in the exercise of their statutory powers, to make and enter upon their records the following agreement with Mr. Riggs as to the acquisition of the land for the new roads:
To continue reading
Request your trial