Jensen v. Stangel, 83-2473
| Decision Date | 30 July 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-2473,83-2473 |
| Citation | 795 F.2d 888 |
| Parties | Paul JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry STANGEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Thomas J. Ferrito, Los Gatos, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
William B. Mayfield, San Jose, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Prior report: 790 F.2d 721.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jensen v. City of San Jose, 83-2473
...v. Stangel, 790 F.2d 721 (9th Cir.1986), (Stephens, J., dissenting). The court, sua sponte, ordered rehearing en banc. Jensen v. Stangel, 795 F.2d 888 (9th Cir.1986). The opinion of the panel is withdrawn. We deny the motion for attorney's fees. ANALYSIS Section 1988 provides that in action......
-
Palmer v. City of Chicago
...... Jensen v. Stangel, 790 F.2d 721, vacated and reh'g en banc granted, 795 F.2d 888 (9th Cir.1986), another ......
-
Soffer v. City of Costa Mesa
...... Soffer filed no response. We review for abuse of discretion. Jensen v. Stangel, 762 F.2d 815, 817 (9th . Page 364. Cir.1985), later proceeding, 790 F.2d 721 (9th ......
- US v. O'CONNOR, CR87-74A.