Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Westhall Co., 76-1764
| Decision Date | 15 May 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1764,76-1764 |
| Citation | 575 F.2d 1176 |
| Parties | JEWEL COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The WESTHALL COMPANY, d/b/a Jewel Mart, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
James M. Porter, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, Robert M. Newbury, Pattishall, McAuliffe & Hofstetter, David C. Hilliard, Floyd A. Mandell, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.
Marvin L. Karp, Ronald Isroff, Ulmer, Berne, Laronge, Glickman & Curtis, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellee Jewel Companies, Inc., filed this action for injunctive and compensatory relief against The Westhall Company, d/b/a Jewel Mart, alleging that defendant's use of the word "Jewel" in its Jewel Mart stores unfairly infringed upon appellant's "Jewel Home Shopping Service." District Judge Thomas D. Lambros entered judgment in favor of the defendant. Reference is made to the comprehensive opinion of the district court for a recitation of pertinent facts. Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Co., 413 F.Supp. 994 (N.D.Ohio 1976).
Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments, and the entire record, the court concludes that the findings of fact of the district court are not clearly erroneous, Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and that no reversible error is disclosed by the record.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.
...Instruments, Inc., 712 F.Supp. 611, 613 (S.D.Ohio 1988); Jewel Cos. v. Westhall Co., 413 F.Supp. 994, 999 (N.D.Ohio 1976), aff'd, 575 F.2d 1176 (6th Cir.1978); Cesare v. Work, 36 Ohio App.3d 26, 26, 28, 520 N.E.2d 586, 589, 590 (1987) (paragraph one of the For the most part, the Ohio Decept......
-
Re/Max Intern., Inc. v. Realty One, Inc., 1:94-CV-0062.
...App.3d 26, 28, 520 N.E.2d 586 (1987). Accord, Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Westhall Co., 413 F.Supp. 994, 999 (N.D.Ohio 1976), aff'd, 575 F.2d 1176 (6th Cir.1978). Plaintiffs' claims under Count IX thus fail for the same reason that their claims under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act fail. Def......
-
Prakash v. Altadis U.S.A. Inc.
...Ohio App.3d 26. 28 ("Ohio Ct. APP, 1987). citing Jewel Companies. Inc. v. Westhall Co., 413 F. Supp. 994. 999 (N.D. Ohio 1976). aff'd 575 F.2d 1176 (1978).J. Count 11 Count 11, which alleges that Individual Defendants have "derivative liability" for violations of RICO, the Sherman Act, and ......
-
Haas Door Co. v. Com
...competition under the federal statutes. Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Westhall Co. (N.D. Ohio 1976), 413 F. Supp. 994, 999, affirmed (C.A.6, 1978), 575 F.2d 1176. We therefore look to federal law for guidance on those issues not clearly addressed by Ohio case law.R. C. 4165.03 provides, in part:......