JEWELL V. FLETCHER
| Docket Number | No. 09-313 |
| Decision Date | 29 April 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 cases
-
Ark. Dev. Fin. Auth. v. Wiley
...suffered damage as a result of the false representation. Muccio v. Hunt , 2016 Ark. 178, 490 S.W.3d 310 (citing Jewell v. Fletcher , 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176 ). Appellees did not allege in their complaint that ADFA ever made a material misrepresentation, much less that such a misrepres......
-
Quarles v. Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehab., LLC
...properly acknowledged, we have consistently ruled that issues cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief. See Jewel l v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176. We affirm the circuit court's ruling that the power of attorney is invalid.IV. Ark. R. Civ. P. 17(b) In this point on a......
-
Nelson v. Loan
...it is well settled that we will not issue an advisory opinion. Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93, 380 S.W.3d 361;Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176. Therefore, we do not decide this issue. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. 1. When Nelson was accepted in the program......
-
Brown v. Kelton
...confidences had occurred—would be purely advisory. It is well-settled that we will not issue an advisory opinion. See Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176. Affirmed.HANNAH, C.J., and BROWN and BAKER, JJ., concur.JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice, concurring. I concur in the result reac......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 9 Standards of Review on Appeal
...Inc., 305 Ark. at 380, 807 S.W.2d at 912. This standard also applies to a circuit court's action under ARCP 62. Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176, 188 (decided on other grounds). After a party moves for a stay in an appellate court, the matter is committed to that court's so......
-
Chapter 4 Stay and Supersedeas
...case did not render the payment under threat of contempt involuntary. Older decisions do not clarify the law: • In Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176, the Supreme Court held that an appeal from a final order directing a distribution of funds was not mooted by the distribution......
-
Chapter 4 Stay and Supersedeas
...case did not render the payment under threat of contempt involuntary. Older decisions do not clarify the law: • In Jewell v. Fletcher, 2010 Ark. 195, 377 S.W.3d 176, the Supreme Court held that an appeal from a final order directing a distribution of funds was not mooted by the distribution......