Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. McGrue
Decision Date | 18 January 2002 |
Citation | 826 So.2d 122 |
Parties | JIM BURKE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al. v. Lori McGRUE. Roebuck Honda et al. v. Lori McGrue. Century Chevrolet-Geo, Inc., et al. v. Lori McGrue. Hoover Toyota, L.L.C. v. Lori McGrue. Serra Toyota, Inc., et al. v. Lori McGrue. Courtesy Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Lori McGrue. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
John Martin Galese, Jeffrey L. Ingram, and David A. Norris of Galese & Ingram, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants Jim Burke Automotive, Inc.; Roebuck Mazda; Med-Center Mazda; Crown Pontiac-Nissan; Crown Automobile Company; King Acura; Limbaugh Toyota; Susan Schein Chevrolet; Premiere Chevrolet; Neil Bonnett Honda; Lynn Layton Chevrolet; Jim Skinner Ford; and Edwards Chevrolet.
Jeffrey E. Friedman, P. Thomas Dazzio, Jr., and Jess S. Boone of Friedman, Leak & Bloom, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants Roebuck Chrysler-Plymouth-Jeep-Eagle, Inc.; Roebuck Honda; and Tameron Automotive Group.
Thomas S. Spires and Matthew C. Williams of Smith, Spires & Peddy, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants Century Chevrolet-Geo, Inc.; Royal Oldsmobile Company, Inc.; and Steel City Pontiac-GMC.
Cecil H. Macoy and Larry S. Logsdon of Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C., Birmingham, for appellant Hoover Toyota, L.L.C.
Paul C. Garrison of Hall, Conerly, Mudd & Bolvig, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant Serra Toyota, Inc.
Jack J. Hall, Jr., of Hall, Conerly, Mudd & Bolvig, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant Courtesy Pontiac GMC, Inc.
Robert H. Ford of The Ford Law Firm, Birmingham; and William M. Dawson, Birmingham, for appellee.
Robert A. Huffaker of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, P.A., Montgomery, for amicus curiae Automobile Dealers Association of Alabama, in support of the application for rehearing.
Kallie C. Lunsford and Michael L. Jones of Galese & Ingram, P.C., Birmingham, for amicus curiae Alabama Independent Automobile Dealers Association, in support of the application for rehearing
On Applications for Rehearing
The opinion of October 5, 2001, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
Lori McGrue sued Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. (an automobile dealership hereinafter referred to as "Jim Burke"), and Roebuck Mazda; Med-Center Mazda; Crown Pontiac-Nissan, Inc.; Crown Automobile Company, Inc.; King Acura; Limbaugh Toyota; Susan Schein Chevrolet, Inc.; Premier Chevrolet, Inc.; Neil Bonnett Honda; Lynn Layton Chevrolet Company; Jim Skinner Ford; Edwards Chevrolet Company, Inc.; Roebuck Chrysler-Plymouth-Jeep-Eagle, Inc.; Roebuck Honda; Tameron Automotive Group; Hoover Toyota, L.L.C.; Courtesy Pontiac GMC, Inc.; Century Chevrolet-Geo, Inc.; Royal Oldsmobile Company, Inc.; Steel City Pontiac-GMC; and Serra Toyota, Inc. (automobile dealerships hereinafter referred to as "the nonsignatory defendants"). The plaintiff sought damages based on allegations of conspiracy, violations of her constitutional right to a trial by jury, and antitrust violations. She also requested certification of her case as a class action.1 Jim Burke and the nonsignatory defendants filed motions to compel McGrue to arbitrate her claims citing three arbitration agreements executed by her and Jim Burke. The trial court denied the motions. Jim Burke and the nonsignatory defendants appeal, in six separate appeals. We reverse the trial court's order denying Jim Burke's motion to compel arbitration, but we affirm the orders denying the nonsignatory defendants' motions to compel arbitration, and we remand.
Lori McGrue purchased a used Nissan Altima automobile from Jim Burke. McGrue and a representative of Jim Burke executed three documents in connection with this purchase: a single-page arbitration agreement, a retail installment contract that contained an arbitration agreement; and an extended-service contract that also contained an arbitration agreement. Shortly after McGrue purchased the vehicle, she learned that it had been wrecked before she purchased it. McGrue complained to Jim Burke about the condition of her vehicle. Jim Burke offered to replace it with another vehicle if McGrue would execute another arbitration agreement. McGrue refused to sign the additional agreement and ultimately did not trade in her vehicle with Jim Burke. McGrue subsequently approached each of the nonsignatory defendants, inquiring about making a trade as to the vehicle. Similarly, the nonsignatory defendants informed her that to deal with her they would require that she execute an arbitration agreement as a condition of the trade. She would not sign an arbitration agreement and did not enter, with any nonsignatory defendant, a transaction involving the vehicle.
Approximately four months after she had purchased the car, McGrue filed this action against Jim Burke and the nonsignatory defendants. In her complaint, McGrue alleged that by their conduct the defendants had violated "her constitutional rights under ... the Alabama Constitution," that the defendants had "engaged in and continue to engage in an illegal civil conspiracy by contriving, combining, federating and conspiring amongst themselves" to violate her rights, and that the defendants had engaged in an "unlawful trust, combine or monopoly." McGrue's complaint included the following paragraph:
"WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for compensatory and punitive damages and statutory penalties of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for herself and each plaintiff similarly situated; to-wit: Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) for herself and approximately Five Hundred Million Dollars ($500,000,000.00) for the members of the class which is estimated at 10,000 members."
(R. 3.)
In response to McGrue's complaint, Jim Burke and the nonsignatory defendants filed motions to enforce the arbitration agreements signed by McGrue and representatives of Jim Burke. In support of its motion, Jim Burke offered the affidavit of Dave Bolden, the comptroller of Jim Burke, in which he states:
(R. 42-45.)
Jim Burke later submitted, as evidence in support of its motion to compel arbitration, a transcription of McGrue's execution of the arbitration agreements; during her execution of the agreements, McGrue asked no questions about them, and they were fully disclosed to her, without misrepresentation.
McGrue submitted the following affidavit with her response to the motions to enforce the arbitration agreements:
(R. 233-34.)
After conducting a hearing on the motions by Jim Burke and the nonsignatory defendants to enforce the arbitration agreements, the trial court entered the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Second Ave. Holdings, LLC v. Latimer (In re Latimer)
...the clauses applicability to the parties to the contract. Fountain v. Ingram, 926 So.2d 333, 338 (Ala.2005); Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. McGrue, 826 So.2d 122, 131 (Ala.2002); Ex parte Stamey, 776 So.2d 85, 89–90 (Ala.2000). The lease specifically limits the applicability of the arbitrati......
-
Second Ave. Holdings, LLC v. Latimer (In re Latimer)
...the clauses applicability to the parties to the contract. Fountain v. Ingram, 926 So.2d 333, 338 (Ala. 2005); Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. McGrue, 826 So.2d 122, 131 (Ala. 2002); Ex parte Stamey, 776 So.2d 85, 89-90 (Ala. 2000). The lease specifically limits the applicability of the arbitr......
-
McConnell Auto. Corp. v. Jackson
...president and affirmed the trial court's order enforcing the arbitration agreement. The defendants also rely on Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. McGrue, 826 So.2d 122 (Ala.2002). McGrue, the plaintiff in that case, purchased a used Nissan Altima automobile from the defendant, Jim Burke Automot......
-
Porter Capital Corp. v. Thomas
...269, 281 (Ala.2006) (quoting Polaris Sales, Inc. v. Heritage Imports, Inc., 879 So.2d at 1133, citing in turn Jim Burke Auto., Inc. v. McGrue, 826 So.2d 122, 132 (Ala.2002)). ...
-
Alabama. Practice Text
...*7, *14-15. 339. Alabama Optometric Ass’n v. State Bd. of Health, 379 F. Supp. 1332 (M.D. Ala. 1974). 340. See Jim Burke Auto. v. McGrue, 826 So. 2d 122 (Ala. 2002); Freeman v. DuPont Pharm. Co., 790 So. 2d 248 (Ala. 2001). 341. ALA. CODE § 8-22-17. 342. Id. § 8-22-18. 343. State ex rel. Ga......