Jodway v. Kennametal, Inc., METALLURGIE-HOBOKEN

Decision Date02 December 1994
Docket NumberDocket Nos. 151005,METALLURGIE-HOBOKEN
Citation525 N.W.2d 883,207 Mich.App. 622
Parties, 26 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 728 William J. JODWAY and Susan Jodway, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENNAMETAL, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, GTE Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Metallurgical Industries, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, and Shieldalloy Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., a foreign corporation, Fansteel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, General Electric Company, a foreign corporation, GTE Valeron Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Hermann C. Starck, Inc., a foreign corporation, Sherritt Gordon Mines, Limited, a foreign corporation, Bridgeport Machine Company, a division of Textron, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Barker Engineering Company, a division of Hohlfelder Stamping, Inc., an Ohio corporation, and Powermatic-Houdaille, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants. Lee E. WALCH, Jr., and Patricia Walch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENNAMETAL, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, GTE Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Metallurgical Industries, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, and Shieldalloy Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., a foreign corporation, Fansteel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, General Electric Company, a foreign corporation, GTE Valeron Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Hermann C. Starck, Inc., a foreign corporation, Sherritt Gordon Mines, Limited, a foreign corporation, Bridgeport Machine Company, a division of Textron, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Barker Engineering Company, a division of Hohlfelder Stamping, Inc., an Ohio corporation, and Powermatic-Houdaille, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants. Linda M. PARISH and Kenneth Parish, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENNAMETAL, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, GTE Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Metallurgical Industries, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, and Shieldalloy Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Metallurgi
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
a foreign corporation, GTE Valeron Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Hermann C. Starck, Inc., a foreign corporation, Sherritt Gordon Mines, Limited, a foreign corporation, Bridgeport Machine Company, a division of Textron, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Barker Engineering Company, a division of Hohlfelder Stamping, Inc., an Ohio corporation, and Powermatic-Houdaille, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants

Sachs, Waldman, O'Hare, Helveston, Hodges & Barnes, P.C. by Ronald S. Weiner, Detroit, for plaintiffs.

Rutledge, Manion, Rabaut, Terry & Thomas, P.C. by Christopher L. Terry, Detroit for Kennametal, Inc.

Petersmarck, Callahan, Bauer & Maxwell, P.C. by Richard W. West, Detroit, for GTE Products Corp.

Blum, Konheim, Elkin & Blum by Irving R. Blum, Southfield, for Metallurgical Industries, Inc.

Holahan, Malloy, Maybaugh & Monnich by Harrison C. Stackpole, Troy for Shieldalloy Corp.

Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward, Cooper & Becker, P.C. by Joseph Kochis and David M. Shafer, Detroit, for Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.

Before TAYLOR, P.J., and CONNOR and CALLAHAN, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the March 6, 1992, order of the circuit court granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs Lampela, Tear, and Bolton also appeal as of right from the circuit court's order granting summary disposition for defendant Metallurgie...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Fleck v. Titan Tire Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 4 Octubre 2001
    ...no inconsistency in its holdings and no basis to reconsider the question. II. The defendant also argues that Jodway v. Kennametal, Inc., 207 Mich.App. 622, 525 N.W.2d 883 (1994), forecloses an implied warranty claim whenever the plaintiff is found to be a sophisticated user. In Jodway, the ......
  • Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors United States, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • 31 Marzo 2017
    ...sophistication is sufficient to relieve the supplier of its duty to warn end user employees. See Jodway v. Kennametal, Inc., 207 Mich.App. 622, 525 N.W.2d 883, 889 (1994) (holding that cobalt dust suppliers "could reasonably rely on the purchaser/employer to warn its employees," because the......
  • Stults v. Int'l Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 11 Julio 2014
    ...596 (1996) ; Rasmussen v. Louisville Ladder Co., Inc., 547–48, 211 Mich.App. 541, 536 N.W.2d 221 (1995) ; Jodway v. Kennametal, Inc., 207 Mich.App. 622, 525 N.W.2d 883, 888–89 (1994). As the Michigan Court of Appeals explained in Portelli:a duty to warn a purchaser of the inherent dangers o......
  • Stults v. Int'l Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 11 Julio 2014
    ...596 (1996); Rasmussen v. Louisville Ladder Co., Inc., 547–48, 211 Mich.App. 541, 536 N.W.2d 221 (1995); Jodway v. Kennametal, Inc., 207 Mich.App. 622, 525 N.W.2d 883, 888–89 (1994). As the Michigan Court of Appeals explained in Portelli: a duty to warn a purchaser of the inherent dangers of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT