John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Company William Warren
Citation | 21 S.Ct. 535,45 L.Ed. 755,181 U.S. 73 |
Decision Date | 08 April 1901 |
Docket Number | No. 196,196 |
Parties | JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , WILLIAM M. WARREN |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
This action was brought in the common pleas court of Delaware county, Ohio, on a policy of insurance issued September 27, 1895, by the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company on the life of George E. Warren and for the benefit of William M. Warren. The insurance company resisted payment on the ground that the policy had been fraudulently obtained by the decedent, in that the answers made by him in his application made a part of the policy, and which were expressly warranted to be complete and true, the policy providing that if any of the statements were untrue it should be void, were false, and that he made them for the purpose of defrauding the insurance company, which would not have issued the policy had it known of the falsity of the answers.
Section 3625 of the Revised Statutes of Ohio provided that 'no answer to any interrogatory made by an applicant, in his or her clearly proved that such answer is wilfully recover upon any policy issued upon such application, or be used in evidence upon any trial to recover upon such policy, unless it be clearly proved that such answer is wilfully false and was fraudulently made, that it is material, and induced the company to issue the policy, and that but for such answer the policy would not have been issued; and, moreover, that the agent of the company had no knowledge of the falsity or fraud of such answer.' Rev. Stat. Ohio, 1894, p. 1899.
The trial judge charged the jury as follows: The defendant duly excepted to that portion of the charge, and to other portions of the same purport. The defendant also requested the court to give the jury the following instruction: 'The policy or contract upon which this action is based, and the application made by George E. Warren for the same, constitute a warranty that all answers by said Warren contained therein are true; and if any one or more of said answers is untrue, though made without actual fraud, and under an innocent misapprehension of the purport of the questions and answers, no contract of insurance is thereby made, and the contract is void ab initio, and your verdict will be for the defendant.' The court declined to give this instruction, and defendant duly excepted.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment was entered thereon, which was affirmed by the circuit court, and finally by the supreme court of Ohio. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Warren, 59 Ohio St. 45, 51 N. E. 546.
Messrs. George K. Nash, W. Z. Davis, and Louis G. Addison for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. John S. Jones, W. B. Jones, and F. M. Marriott for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice fuller delivered the opinion of the court:
In State ex rel. Richards v. Ackerman, 51 Ohio St. 163, 24 L. R. A. 298, 37 N. E. 828, it was ruled that as foreign insurance companies and associations, whether incorporated or not, before commencing business in the state, were required to obtain a certificate of authority to do so, which conferred on the company or association receiving it the right and privilege of carrying on its business in the state, the privilege so conferred was a franchise. In the course of the opinion the court quoted with approval, from Spelling on Extraordinary Relief, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Continental Life Ins. & Inv. Co. v. Hattabaugh
... ... 81 21 Idaho 285 CONTINENTAL LIFE INSURANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff, ... 29, 20 S.Ct. 518, 44 L.Ed. 657; Hancock ... Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U.S. 73, ... 28, 20 ... S.Ct. 518, 44 L.Ed. 657; John Hancock Mutual Life Ins ... Co. v. Warren , 181 ... ...
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Parsons, 25685
... ... from chancery court of Warren county HON. R. B. ANDERSON, ... Special ... States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and others. From a decree ... overruling the ... insurance policy is bound to know and is chargeable with s ... contents. Life Ins. Co. v. Bouldin, 100 Miss. 677 ... The ... Fleming, 25 Miss. 135; ... Mitchell v. Hancock County, 91 Miss. 414 ... The ... I ... There was a mutual mistake made by appellant, the surety, and ... Kearzey, 96 U.S. 595; John Hancock Mut. Ins. Co. v ... Warren, 181 U.S ... ...
-
State v. Vandiver
... ... 222 Mo. 206 ... STATE ex rel. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES ... , Insurance Superintendent. † ... Supreme Court of ... issue a license authorizing any insurance company paying a salary to any one person of more than ... Society of the United States, against William D. Vandiver, Superintendent of Insurance. Writ ... Herbert S. Hadley, Atty. Gen., and John" Kennish, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent ... \xC2" ... R. A. 227, 58 Am. St. Rep. 638; Security Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 202 U. S. 246, 26 Sup ... S. 389, 20 Sup. Ct. 962, 44 L. Ed. 1116; Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 21 ... ...
-
Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe
... ... ; § 9465, Exemption from general insurance laws of the State; § 9466, Benefits; § 9467, To ... are not given to these provisions, the mutual rights and obligations of the members of such ... issued by a stock or a mutual insurance company ... We rely upon the ... the full term of the member's expectancy of life had expired. This was so held in the face of a ... 1089, L.R.A.1916A, 771.' See also, John Hancock Ins. Co. v. Yates, 299 U.S. 178, 182, ... 139; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U.S. 73, 75, 21 S.Ct. 535, 536, 45 L.Ed ... ...