John R. Thompson Co. v. District of Columbia, 11039

Decision Date15 February 1954
Docket NumberNo. 11039,11044.,11039
PartiesJOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Inc. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Inc.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Before STEPHENS, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON, CLARK, WILBUR K. MILLER, PRETTYMAN, BAZELON, FAHY, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

When these cases were previously before us,1 a majority of the court found it unnecessary to decide whether or not the 1873 Act of the Legislative Assembly repealed the pertinent provisions of the Act of 1872, though the matter was briefed and submitted. The minority opinion, in expressing the view that the provisions of the 1873 Act are valid, unrepealed and in effect, stated also that since they are in substitution for the provisions of 1872 the latter, with regard to restaurants, are repealed. 92 U.S.App.D.C. at page 53, 203 F.2d at page 598. Reference was made to the opinion of Judge Clagett in the Municipal Court of Appeals for a fuller discussion.2 The Supreme Court in upholding the 1873 Act and in reversing our earlier decision with respect to all counts of the information left open on remand to this court the question whether repeal of the 1872 Act had occurred. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., 346 U.S. 100, 118, 73 S.Ct. 1007, 97 L.Ed. 1480.

We now hold that, with respect to restaurants, the 1873 Act repealed that of 1872 upon which the first count of the information is based. For this reason the judgment of the Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia sustaining the quashing of the first count of the information is affirmed. With respect to counts two, three, and four of the information, which are based on the 1873 Act, the decision of the Supreme Court requires that our judgment of January 22, 1953, be vacated and a new judgment be entered affirming also as to those counts the judgment of the Municipal Court of Appeals.

It is so ordered.

Circuit Judge WILBUR K. MILLER did not participate in this decision.

Circuit Judge PROCTOR died September 17, 1953, prior to consideration of the present decision. Circuit Judge DANAHER, who took his seat upon the court November 20, 1953, has not participated in the consideration or decision of these cases.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 4 Agosto 1987
    ... ... United States Court of Appeals, ... District of Columbia Circuit ... Argued Sept. 27, 1985 ... 2 J. Moore, J. Lucas, H. Fink & C. Thompson, Moore's Federal Practice p 4.08, at 4-95 to 4-96 (1985); ... ...
  • Tynes v. Gogos
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 22 Agosto 1958
    ...181 et seq. (1954). See also Notes, 42 Geo.L.J. 132 (1953); 67 Harv.L.Rev. 107 (1953); 28 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1316 (1953). 6. 1954, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 214 F.2d 210, 211. 7. See also Eckloff v. District of Columbia, 1890, 135 U.S. 240, 241, 10 S.Ct. 752, 34 L.Ed. 120. A similar comparison was ma......
  • Fields v. District of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 2 Febrero 1968
    ...of Columbia, 92 U.S. App.D.C. 34, 203 F.2d 579, rev'd 346 U.S. 100, 73 S.Ct. 1007, 97 L.Ed. 1480 (1953), on remand, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 214 F. 2d 210 (1954); American Cas. Co. v. Heilman, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 170, 171, 194 F.2d 348 5 Rule 1(c). See also Thomason v. Thomason, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 27......
  • Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 26 Enero 1981
    ... ...         Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT