John v. Smith
| Decision Date | 04 February 1899 |
| Docket Number | 2,421. |
| Citation | John v. Smith, 91 F. 827 (9th Cir. 1899) |
| Parties | JOHN v. SMITH et al. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Watson & Beekman and W. W. Thayer, for plaintiff.
Catlin Kollock & Catlin, H. B. Nicholas, and Edward N. Deady, for defendants.
On about the 27th day of May, 1886, James John died in Multnomah county, leaving a will, which, omitting formal parts, is as follows:
On June 30th of the same year this will was admitted to probate in the county court of Multnomah county, and the defendantPhilip T. Smith was appointed executor in the will, the other persons named therein having declined to act.On November 14, 1891, Benjamin F. John, the plaintiff herein, instituted proceedings in the Multnomah countycourt to revoke the order of probate, and for a decree against the validity of the will, upon the ground of lack of capacity in the testator to make the will, and upon the further ground that the attempted devise to charitable uses created a perpetuity, and was so indefinite and uncertain in respect to the object of the trust, its beneficiaries, and the trustees to execute it, that a court of equity could not enforce it.The first ground was abandoned at the hearing.The county court upon the hearing denied the petition, and on appeal to the state circuit court the decree of the county court was affirmed.Thereupon the plaintiff took an appeal to the supreme court of the state(47 P. 341), where...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
E. Henry Wemme Co. v. Selling
...and embraces objects and purposes which are not charitable. The will cannot be sustained as creating a public charity." In John v. Smith (C. C.) 91 F. 827, 829, Judge Bellinger the Oregon federal court said: "The admittedly true rule is stated by the court to be that the trust will be enfor......
-
Hadley v. Forsee
...v. Wallace, 7 B. Monroe 611; Morville v. Fowle, 144 Mass. 110; Trafton v. Black, 187 Ill. 36; Hoeffer v. Clogan, 171 Ill. 462; John v. Smith, 91 F. 827; Pennoyer Wadhams, 20 Ore. 280; Hood v. Dorer, 107 Wis. 149; Gass v. Wilhite, 2 Dana 170. The support and propagation of religion is clearl......
-
Morris v. Nowlin Lumber Co.
... ... NOWLIN LUMBER COMPANY Supreme Court of Arkansas April 17, 1911 ... Appeal ... from Pulaski Chancery Court; John E. Martineau, Chancellor; ... reversed ... ... Judgment reversed and denied ... Rose, ... Hemingway, ... by a declaration thereof in writing. Section 3666, ... Kirby's Dig.; Robinson v. Robinson , 45 ... Ark. 481; Salyers v. Smith , 67 Ark. 526, 55 ... S.W. 936. But under our statute and decisions a ... [140 S.W. 3] ... conveyance of land, absolute upon its face, ... ...
-
Bryant v. Cadle
...to a few cases involving facts sufficiently analogous in relation to the point decided to entitle them to special consideration. In John v. Smith, 91 F. 827, which involved land devised will to the executors in trust for a charitable purpose, the executor in possession was held entitled to ......