John v. Tishman Construction Corporation of New York
| Decision Date | 15 August 2006 |
| Docket Number | 2005-04121. |
| Citation | John v. Tishman Construction Corporation of New York, 32 A.D.3d 458, 819 N.Y.S.2d 475, 2006 NY Slip Op 6222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006) |
| Parties | EDNA JOHN, Appellant, v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a piece of sheet metal or metal shelf in the hallway of her employer's basement. At the time of the incident, there were ongoing renovations throughout the building. The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the construction manager, the defendant Tishman Construction Corporation of New York (hereinafter Tishman). Tishman moved for summary judgment, inter alia, dismissing the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence causes of action insofar as asserted against it, contending that it did not create or have notice of a dangerous condition in the hallway. The Supreme Court granted the motion, finding that Tishman did not...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Puzhayeva v. City of N.Y.
...to raise an issue of fact (see Wolin v. Town of N. Hempstead, 129 A.D.3d 833, 836, 11 N.Y.S.3d 627 ; John v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of N.Y., 32 A.D.3d 458, 819 N.Y.S.2d 475 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the TA defendants' motion which was for summary judgm......
-
Schutt v. Dynasty Transp. of Ohio, Inc.
...have actual or constructive notice of the condition that allegedly caused the injured plaintiff's fall (see John v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of N.Y., 32 A.D.3d 458, 819 N.Y.S.2d 475 ). The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. The plaintiffs’ contention that the oil......
-
Schutt v. Dynasty Transp. of Ohio
...create or have actual or constructive notice of the condition that allegedly caused the injured plaintiff's fall (see John v Tishman Constr. Corp. of N.Y., 32 A.D.3d 458). The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. The plaintiffs' contention that the oil on which ......
- New York University Hospital Rusk Institute v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company