JOHNSON BY JOHNSON v. United States, 84 C 1406.

Decision Date10 October 1984
Docket NumberNo. 84 C 1406.,84 C 1406.
Citation594 F. Supp. 728
PartiesMelissa JOHNSON, an infant by Barbara JOHNSON, her mother and natural guardian and Barbara Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

Richard Frank, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs.

Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Kevin P. Simmons, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for defendant.

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this complaint pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (the Act), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), alleging that the negligent supervision of government employees caused their injuries. Defendant brings this motion to dismiss and for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on grounds of sovereign immunity. Because it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the court does not reach the merits of defendant's motion.

The Act permits suits against the government for certain torts committed by government employees acting within the scope of their employment. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). However, the Act requires the presentation of a claim to the appropriate federal agency and a final denial of that claim as a prerequisite to starting an action in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a).

Plaintiffs filed a complaint on Standard Form 95 with the United States Postal Service. Their complaint alleged that because of acts occurring on "6/3/82 and various dates prior thereto" the plaintiffs suffered personal injuries. Paragraph 11 of Standard Form 95 asks for a description of the accident including "all known facts and circumstances attending the damage, injury, or death, identifying persons and property involved and the cause thereof." Plaintiffs completed Paragraph 11 as follows: "Melissa Johnson was sexually molested, assaulted, and, on information and belief, sodomized and threatened by Postman Luis Ojeda. Barbara Johnson sustained damage for medical and psychological treatment and loss of services."

The Postal Service denied plaintiffs' claims, first, because the incident described "occurred while Mr. Ojeda was acting outside the scope of his employment." Second, the agency denied the claim stating that:

The incident you describe as the basis of your claim is an assault and battery. While Congress has generally waived the Government's immunity for certain wrongful acts of its employees commited (sic) within the scope of their employment, Congress has specifically provided, in 28 U.S.C. 2680(h), that the Government's immunity from suit and from considering claims for personal injury has not been waived for any claim arising out of an assault and battery.

Plaintiffs then brought this action. Plaintiffs' complaint does not allege assault and battery. While it alleges that Ojeda sexually molested, sodomized and threatened the plaintiff, the theory of this complaint is that defendant had "notice or knowledge of Ojeda's criminal and perverted propensities" and that defendant's negligence in employing, assigning and supervising Ojeda caused plaintiffs' injuries.

Section 2675(a)'s requirement that claimants present their tort claims to the relevant federal agency before suing in federal court is jurisdictional and cannot be waived. Keene Corp. v. United States, 700 F.2d 836, 841 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 195, 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983). Filing an administrative complaint before filing a civil suit permits the agency best informed about the activity which gave rise to the claim to investigate, evaluate and possibly settle a claim without need for litigation. See S.Rep. No. 1327, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. 7, reprinted in 1966 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News 2515, 2517. This purpose requires that the claim bring "to the Government's attention facts sufficient to enable it thoroughly to investigate its potential liability and to conduct settlement negotiations with the claimant." Rise v. United States, 630 F.2d 1068, 1071 (5th Cir.1980). The burden is on the claimant to provide adequate factual details of the nature of the claim at the agency level. See Keene, 700 F.2d at 842. Because the act waives sovereign immunity, this presentment requirement must be strictly adhered to. Id. at 841. Provided the administrative complaint fairly apprises "the Government of the facts leading to the claimant's injury, new theories of why those facts constitute tortious conduct can be included in a federal court complaint." Rise, 630 F.2d at 1071.

Plaintiffs' administrative complaint made no factual allegations even hinting of negligent supervision. It alleged only that Ojeda assaulted, threatened and molested the infant plaintiff...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Gonzagowski v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • September 1, 2020
    ...sexual assault and battery did not provide not sufficient notice of medical malpractice allegation); Johnson by Johnson v. United States, 594 F. Supp. 728 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (Nickerson, J.)(holding that an administrative claim alleging of sexual assault did not give sufficient notice that the ......
  • Johnson by Johnson v. U.S., 939
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 8, 1986
    ...Judge: Barbara and Melissa Johnson, mother and daughter respectively, appeal from a judgment of the Eastern District of New York, 594 F.Supp. 728, Eugene H. Nickerson, Judge, dismissing their claims against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1346(b),......
  • Miles v. Bell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • August 28, 1985
    ...v. National Assoc. of Flood Insurers, 520 F.2d at 19-20; Rogers v. United States, 568 F.Supp. 894 (E.D.N.Y.1983); Johnson v. United States, 594 F.Supp. 728 (E.D.N.Y. 1984); Kantor v. Kahn, 463 F.Supp. 1160; Luria v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 473 F.Supp. 242, 244 (S.D.N.Y.1979). But see Blue ......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 23, 2004
    ...among the thousands of suits presented to it. Keene, 700 F.2d at 842. The defendant also relies on Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. United States, 594 F.Supp. 728, 730 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd on other grounds, 788 F.2d 845 (2d Cir.1986). However, the Second Circuit reversed the district court's dec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT