Johnson Higgins of California v. United States, 166

Citation77 L.Ed. 426,287 U.S. 459,53 S.Ct. 209
Decision Date19 December 1932
Docket NumberNo. 166,166
PartiesJOHNSON & HIGGINS OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Cletus Keating, of New York City, for petitioner.

Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

The material facts as found by the Court of Claims are these: In December, 1918, fire broke out on the United States Army Transport Logan bound from San Francisco to Manila with a general cargo belonging to various owners. The Logan was under the operation, management, and control of the United States. The cargo consisted in part of military supplies for American troops in Siberia and the Philippine Islands, supplies belonging to the government of the Philippine Islands, supplies belonging to the American Red Cross, and a small amount of personal property of officers of the United States Army, all of which was being transported free of charge. In extinguishing the fire, some of the cargo was damaged by water, and some or all of the cargo was covered by insurance against general average losses.

In August, 1922, the general superintendent and administrative officer of the Army Transport Service of the Quartermaster Corps requested the petitioner, a corporation doing business as average adjuster and insurance broker, to prepare 'a statement of general average in order that the responsibility of the various parties concerned may be determined.' Attached to this request was a communication from the Acting Judge Advocate General of the United States to the Quartermaster General which referred to the claim of the marine underwriters for contribution in general average, and stated: 'The claim being a valid one, it is therefore recommended that prompt steps be taken to ascertain the amount due the insurance company by way of contribution in general average. For this purpose, it is recommended that the matter be referred to a general average adjuster.' Petitioner accordingly made its investigation, and prepared and submitted to the general superintendent of the Army Transport Service at San Francisco the usual general average statement. For this service and incidental disbursements, petitioner made the 'usual, customary and reasonable charge,' and, upon disallowance of the claim by the Comptroller General, petitioner brought this suit.

The Court of Claims held that the government was not liable to contribute in general average and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • U.S. v. Dion
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 20, 1985
    ... Page 674 ... 762 F.2d 674 ... UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, ... Dwight DION, ... Kenyon and Richard Johnson, Sioux Falls, S.D., for Dion and appellants ... ...
  • Rivera v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1993
    ... ...         Appellant states the issues as follows: ... I. Whether the ... United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413, ... The California Court of Appeals recently faced a similar ... Johnson, 565 F.2d 179, 182 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, ... ...
  • State v. Lee
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1994
    ... ... activities conducted in sister states is to be determined by Connecticut law rather ... United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 ... ...
  • U.S. v. Twigg
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • November 17, 1978
    ... Page 373 ... 588 F.2d 373 ... UNITED STATES of America ... William Christopher TWIGG, ... 1978); United States v. Johnson, 565 F.2d 179, 181 (1st Cir. 1977). Where the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT