Johnson v. Beto, 72-2218.

Citation469 F.2d 1396
Decision Date20 December 1972
Docket NumberNo. 72-2218.,72-2218.
PartiesLee Otis JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)

Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen., Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellant.

William F. Walsh, Bobby H. Caldwell, Charles A. Keilin, Arthur J. Mandell, Bennett Stokes, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellee.

Before WISDOM, BELL and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On the ground that Lee Otis Johnson had been denied a fair and impartial trial in a Texas state court, the United States District Court, 337 F.Supp. 1371, granted habeas corpus relief. Of course, Texas has the option of trying Johnson again.

Upon briefs and oral argument, the judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Jarrett v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • March 2, 1983
    ...McNew v. State, 608 S.W.2d 166, 174 (Tex.Cr.App.1978, reh. den.). See also Johnson v. Beto, 337 F.Supp. 1371, 1379 (S.D.Tex.,1972), aff'd 469 F.2d 1396. We therefore do not find that the punishment assessed Jarrett was cruel and Ground of error four is overruled. Jarrett's fifth ground of e......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT