Johnson v. Board of Ed. of City of Chicago

Decision Date06 December 1979
Docket NumberNo. 78-1215,78-1215
Citation604 F.2d 504
PartiesKathy Sue JOHNSON, etc., et al., and Darcel Milton, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Shalom L. Kohn, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard E. Girard, Law Dept., Bd. of Ed., Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, BAUER and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the Constitution permits local school authorities to impose racial quotas on enrollments in connection with a desegregation plan voluntarily enacted to prevent De facto segregation in the public schools. Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the order of the district court upholding the challenged desegregation plan as constitutional and enjoining the defendants-appellees to maintain and to continue the plan, as modified to provide for the voluntary busing of students excluded from admission to their neighborhood high schools to alternative integrated high schools. Appellants further appeal from the order of the district court denying their petition for attorneys fees. We affirm the judgments appealed from for the reasons set forth below.

I

These consolidated civil rights actions for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief were filed on March 15, 1976, challenging as unconstitutional a desegregation plan adopted voluntarily by the Board of Education of the City of Chicago in an effort to arrest the trend toward segregated enrollments at two Chicago public secondary schools. The challenged desegregation plan, commonly referred to as the "Student Racial Stabilization Quota Plan" ("Plan"), established a ceiling on enrollments and imposed racial quotas with respect to admissions at Morgan Park and Gage Park High Schools. Plaintiffs-appellants in Johnson v. Board of Education are black children and their parents residing in the Morgan Park High School attendance area. 1 Plaintiffs-appellants in Milton v. Board of Education are black children and their parents residing in the Gage Park High School attendance area. Plaintiffs' complaints alleged that the Plans, as instituted at Morgan Park and Gage Park High Schools, deprived them of their rights under the Constitution and under Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, and under Title 20 U.S.C. § 1703(c) because the Plans restricted the admission of minority students to these high schools solely on the basis of race.

Defendants-appellees named in these actions are the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, the individual members of the Board of Education, and Dr. Joseph P. Hannon, General Superintendent of Schools. Defendants filed answers to the complaints, denying the Plans were unconstitutional and denying plaintiffs were deprived of any rights under federal law. Defendants further alleged that plaintiffs had no constitutional right to attend Morgan Park or Gage Park High School since the Board of Education, vested by state statute with the supervision and management of the public school system of the City of Chicago, is empowered to divide the city into attendance areas and to apportion the pupils to the several schools, taking into consideration the prevention of racial segregation in the public schools. In the performance of these statutory duties, the Board contended the Plans were necessary to alleviate overcrowding and to promote integration at Morgan Park and Gage Park High Schools, both of which had experienced an accelerated change in the size and racial composition of their enrollments as a result of a concomitant demographic change in the residential neighborhoods encompassing the attendance areas of these schools.

On April 29, 1976, three days after the filing of defendants' answer, plaintiffs in Johnson presented a motion for a temporary restraining order seeking to enjoin the implementation of the Plan at Morgan Park High School, which was scheduled to begin the next day with a lottery drawing to select the incoming freshman class for the fall of 1976. The district court denied the motion. On August 17, 1976, after extensive discovery by means of interrogatories and document production, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction or in the alternative for summary judgment. On September 27, 1976, the district court denied the alternative motion for summary judgment, but deferred ruling on plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction, stating its preference for a modification of the Plans to include a voluntary busing program for students excluded from these two schools to attend alternative integrated high schools.

At the conclusion of discovery, entry of a final pretrial order, stipulation of additional facts and admission of exhibits into evidence, and after both parties agreed to withdraw objections, the parties rested on June 27, 1977. At that time, counsel for the Board advised the court of a pending modification of the Plans to be acted upon at the next Board meeting. The district court then stated it was prepared to find the Plans as originally adopted to be unconstitutional, but would reserve final ruling pending any modification the Board might wish to present.

On July 13, 1977, the Board adopted a modification of the Plans, which provided bus transportation to white or integrated schools from a convenient point near the residences of all students in the Gage Park and Morgan Park attendance areas who were not selected for admission to these two schools under the Plans. By an order of the district court entered August 12, 1977, the Board was directed to implement procedures for publicity and student counseling with respect to the Plans, as modified, and further, to provide that designated spaces at the alternative schools which were not filled by students excluded from one school (e. g., Gage Park) would be made available to students excluded from the other school (e. g., Morgan Park).

On December 30, 1977, the district court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and granted judgment in favor of the defendants. The court held that the Plans, as modified to include bus transportation to primarily white or integrated schools for those students not admitted to Gage Park or Morgan Park High Schools, restored to plaintiffs their constitutional rights in that plaintiffs had a meaningful opportunity to attend a Chicago public high school in an integrated setting. The court further ordered that defendants be enjoined to continue the Plans, as modified. On January 23, 1978, the district court granted plaintiffs' petition for costs, but denied their request for attorneys fees.

Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from these adverse judgments to this Court. First, appellants contend the Plans, as modified, violate their rights secured by the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Second, appellants contend that the district erred in denying their request for attorneys fees.

II

Before addressing the merits of the appellants' contentions, however, it is necessary to explicate in appropriate detail the development and implementation of the challenged desegregation plan, as supported by the record before this Court.

Gage Park and Morgan Park High Schools Prior to the Adoption of the Plans

Gage Park High School, 5630 South Rockwell Avenue (2600 West), Chicago, and Morgan Park High School, 1744 West Pryor Avenue (11200 South), are public high schools owned and operated by the Board of Education of the City of Chicago. But for the Board's Plans, freezing enrollment and establishing racial quotas with respect to admissions at these two high schools, all eighth grade students residing in the Gage Park or Morgan Park attendance areas would have been offered the opportunity to attend Gage Park or Morgan Park High School. In 1975, Gage Park High School was approximately 41% White and 59% Nonwhite, while Morgan Park was 37% White and 63% Nonwhite. The comparable figures for 1976 are 42% White and 58% Nonwhite for Gage Park, and 38% White and 62% Nonwhite for Morgan Park. As the district court found, students enrolled at Gage Park and Morgan Park are thus attending school in an integrated setting.

The district court also found that the residential neighborhoods encompassing attendance areas for these two schools were in part undergoing an accelerated racial change from white to black in the period immediately preceding the implementation of the Plans, which began in September 1975 at Gage Park High School and in September 1976 at Morgan Park High School. Both schools were also operating in excess of their permanent facility capacities because of increasing enrollments.

During the period from 1972 to 1974, black enrollment at Gage Park had increased from 1,056 to 1,361. The racial composition of all students attending public and nonpublic elementary schools in the Gage Park attendance area in 1975 was 5,235 black, 8,617 white, 1,174 Hispanic and 110 "other". As of January 30, 1976, enrollment at Gage Park High School was 2,441 and the school was operating at 106% Of capacity.

During the period from 1972 to 1975, black student enrollment at Morgan Park had increased from 52.3% To 62.3% And white student enrollment had declined from 45.7% To 36.9%. In this same period, total enrollment increased from 3,092 to 3,423. The racial composition of all students attending public and nonpublic elementary schools and residing in the Morgan Park attendance area in 1976 was 6,842 black 7,312 white, and 144 "other". As of January 30, 1976, enrollment at Morgan Park High School was 3,323 and the school was operating at 128.6% Of capacity of permanent facilities.

Statistics presented by the Board of Education indicated that in rapidly changing neighborhoods where no action had been undertaken by the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Wessmann v. Gittens
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 30 Julio 1998
    ... ... Viggiani, Hill & Barlow, Merita Hopkins, Corporation Counsel of the City of Boston, and Diane DiIanni, Special Assistant Corporation Counsel ... Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 911, 115 S.Ct. 2475, 132 L.Ed.2d 762 (1995) (citations and ... Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) ]." Morgan ... ...
  • Hampton v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • 20 Junio 2000
    ... ... Plaintiffs ... JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al. Defendants ... No. CIV.A.3:98-CV-262-H ... Not until Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 111 S.Ct. 630, 112 L.Ed.2d 715 ... See Wessmann, 160 F.3d at 830 (Lipez, J., dissenting) ( citing Johnson, 604 F.2d at 515; United States v. Perry County Bd. of Educ., 567 F.2d ... 42. See Johnson v. Board of Educ. of the City of Chicago, 604 F.2d 504, 516 (7th Cir.1979), vacated and remanded on other ... ...
  • Rybicki v. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS OF STATE OF ILL.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 12 Enero 1982
    ... ... 1082 ... Chester J. RYBICKI, et al., Plaintiffs, ... The STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants ... Miguel ... Jurek, Douglas A. Poe, Roger W. Barrett, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., Jerris Leonard, Jerris Leonard and 574 F. Supp. 1084 Assoc., ... Supp. 1085 representation, in the City of Chicago. They also allege that the plan is politically unfair, contains ... Cf. Johnson v. Board of Education of Chicago, 604 F.2d 504 (7th Cir. 1979), vacated ... ...
  • Kelley v. Metropolitan County Bd. of Educ. of Nashville and Davidson County, Tenn.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 27 Julio 1982
    ... ... KELLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, ... METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NASHVILLE AND ... DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ... Nabrit, III, Bill Lann Lee, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants ...         William R. Willis, Jr., ... See Johnson v. Board of Education of Chicago, 604 F.2d 504, 517 (7th Cir. 1979), ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT