Johnson v. Cabana, 86-6919
Decision Date | 19 May 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 86-6919,A-842,86-6919 |
Citation | 95 L.Ed.2d 861,481 U.S. 1061,107 S.Ct. 2207 |
Parties | Edward Earl JOHNSON v. Don CABANA, Acting Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections () |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The application for stay of execution of the sentence of death presented to JUSTICE WHITE and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), I would grant the application for stay of execution and the petition for certiorari, and would vacate the death sentence in this case.
Even if I did not take this view, I would still grant the application for a stay and the petition for certiorari. Petitioner raises a substantial claim that, since trial, he has become incompetent and therefore may not be executed. In Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), the Court held that the Eighth Amendment bars execution of convicted prisoners found to be incompetent. The Court rested its holding on the lack of "retributive value [in] executing a person who has no comprehension of why he has been singled out and stripped of his fundamental right to life." Id., 106 S.Ct. at 2602. The Court also relied on "the natural abhorrence civilized societies feel at killing one who has no capacity to come to grips with his own conscience or deity." Ibid. In a concurring opinion, Justice POWELL stated:
Petitioner's claim is founded on an affidavit by a licensed clinical psychologist stating his findings as to petitioner's sanity. Following a five-hour evaluation of petitioner, and after a review of petitioner's medical records and of statements by others acquainted with petitioner, the affiant concluded:
The plausibility of this conclusion is buttressed by the affidavit of a psychiatrist, who evaluated petitioner prior to his trial. That evaluation "revealed substantial mental defects," and the affiant diagnosed that petitioner had "suffered from brain dysfunction" from birth, and "suffered from [an] organic brain syndrome" that intermittently caused personality and behavioral changes. He concluded "that [petitioner's] mental problems were severe." Id., at 3-4.
Petitioner first presented this evidence to the Mississippi Supreme Court pursuant to the State's post-conviction procedures set forth in Miss.Stat.Ann. § 99-19-57(2)(b). In response, the State submitted affidavits that disputed petitioner's claims. The Mississippi Supreme Court did not hold a hearing in this matter, nor did it even consider the affidavits presented by the State. Instead, the court simply concluded, without explanation, that it did "not find it necessary to consider [the State's affidavits] because Petitioner fails to make out a prima facie case of present insanity by his affidavits." Johnson v. State, --- So.2d ----, ---- n. 1 (No. DP-16, May 18, 1987) (slip op. 1, n. 1). The court summarily held that petitioner's evidence was insufficient standing alone to raise "a reasonable probability" that petitioner is presently "insane." Id., at ----.
The Constitution does not require an indigent prisoner to produce more than what petitioner has in order to meet the burden of coming forward. There is nothing amiss, at least facially, in petitioner's affidavits. The affidavits were prepared by licensed professionals, not by family members or friends. Compare Evans v McCotter, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foster v. State, 95-DP-00750-SCT
...177, 183 (5th Cir.1986); Johnson v. Cabana, 661 F.Supp. 356 (S.D.Miss.), aff'd, 818 F.2d 333 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1061, 107 S.Ct. 2207, 95 L.Ed.2d 861 (1987) (trial counsel's failure to present mitigating evidence of mental impairment did not render assistance ineffective wher......
-
Martin v. Dugger
...... at 438, 83 S.Ct. at 848-49. The Court would apply the waiver test of Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), "an intentional ...In Johnson v. Cabana, 818 F.2d 333, 336 (5th Cir.1987), the court interpreted Ford as prohibiting the execution of a ......
-
US v. Jerome, CR-N-87-16-ECR and CV-N-95-375-ECR.
...competent assistance that Strickland would condemn." Johnson v. Cabana, 818 F.2d 333, 342 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1061, 107 S.Ct. 2207, 95 L.Ed.2d 861 (1987). Moreover, the CCE violation was the only offense charged in the indictment for which parole would be unavailable,3 and, a......
-
Neal v. State, 92-KA-00601-SCT
...Johnson v. State, 508 So.2d 1126 (Miss.1987); Johnson v. Cabana, 818 F.2d 333, 340 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1061, 107 S.Ct. 2207, 95 L.Ed.2d 861 (1987). Neal makes no assertion that there has been any change in his mental condition since the trial in this case. In fact, the ev......
-
When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
...of an individual's right to life. see, e.g., Rector v. Bryant, 501 U.S. 1239, 1241 (1991) (Marshall, J., dissenting); Johnson v. Cabana, 481 U.S. 1061 (1987) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409 (1986); Woods v. Nierstheimer, 328 U.S. 211, 216 (157) See supra not......