Johnson v. Cox, 7 Div. 811

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
Writing for the CourtMAYFIELD, J.
Citation198 Ala. 699,73 So. 923
PartiesJOHNSON et al. v. COX.
Decision Date30 November 1916
Docket Number7 Div. 811

73 So. 923

198 Ala. 699

JOHNSON et al.

7 Div. 811

Supreme Court of Alabama

November 30, 1916

Appeal from City Court of Gadsden; John H. Disque, Judge.

Action between R.W. Johnson and others and John F. Cox. From a judgment for Cox, Johnson and others appeal. Affirmed.

George D. Motley, of Gadsden, for appellants.

J.M. Miller, of Gadsden, for appellee.


Affirmed on authority of Johnson et al. v. Cox (7 Div. 812) 73 So. 922.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Marbury Lumber Co. v. Lamont, 3 Div. 240
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 18 d4 Janeiro d4 1917
    ...73 So. 923 198 Ala. 566 MARBURY LUMBER CO. v. LAMONT. 3 Div. 240Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 18, Appeal from Circuit Court, Autauga County; W.W. Pearson, Judge. Suit by Mary B. Lamont against the Marbury Lumber Company. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed. [73 So. 924] ......
  • Johnson v. Cox, 7 Div. 812
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 30 d4 Novembro d4 1916
    ...that the trial in the justice court was as to the detention of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of section 13, and the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. [73 So. 923.] 1/4 of section 24, both in township 11, range 7 east; and on appeal the plaintiff was allowed to change the complaint so as to substitute the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT