Johnson v. Hazou
Decision Date | 13 February 2017 |
Docket Number | Case No.:1:15CV1811 |
Parties | GERMANEY JOHNSON, Plaintiff v. OFFICER ZAKI HAZOU, et al., Defendants |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio |
The plaintiff Germaney Johnson filed a Section 1983 suit pro se in this court, against defendants Officer Zaki Hazou, Officer Ronald Kubacki, and Sgt. Dave Tomcho, all of the Strongsville Police Department. In brief summary, the lawsuit arises from Johnson's arrest after he refused to provide his driver's license or vehicle registration to police officers who asked him to provide the information when they approached his car, which was stopped and appeared to be disabled in the middle of a roadway. Johnson alleges that he advised the police officers that he had run out of gas and was just waiting in the car for his wife to return from a nearby gas station. (R. 1, at 6.) Johnson refused repeated requests to provide his identification, argued with officers and subsequently was arrested.
Johnson's complaint contains multiple claims: (1) excessive force; (2) deprivation of free speech and expression; (3) conspiracy and retaliation for the exercise of constitutional rights; (4) fraud; (5) breach of oath; (6) kidnapping; (7) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (8) negligent infliction of emotional distress; and, (9) negligence.1 (R. 1.) The latter three claims are designated as "common law" (state law) claims. (R. 1, PageID #: 24-25.) Defendants have moved for summary judgment (R. 28), Johnson has filed an opposition brief (R. 29), and defendants filed a reply brief (R. 30).
After a thorough analysis of the parties' filings and applicable law, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and judgment rendered in defendants favor, for the following reasons.
The evidence the parties have placed before the court is as follows. On February 9, 2014, Johnson was driving with his family in a Cadillac Escalade ("SUV") that was not registered to him.2 (R. 28-1, Defendants' Exhibit ("DX") A, Johnson dep., PageID #: 288-289.) Johnson's vehicle ran out of gas and stopped in the left lane heading north on Pearl road. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 273-274, 291.) Another driver stopped and helped Johnson push the SUV out of the left traffic lane, into the center (turning) lane. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 275, 280-281, 283-284.) Johnson and one son remained in the SUV, with the hazard lights on, while his wife and another son walked to a nearby gas station. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 285, 287.) Approximately ten minutes later, a police car pulled up behind Johnson's disabled vehicle. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 294.)
Officer Hazou and his partner, Officer Kubacki, both in uniform, were patrolling in a marked police car, when Officer Hazou noticed the SUV stopped in the middle turning lane, with its hazard lights activated, and impeding the normal flow of traffic. (R. 28-2, DX B, Hazou aff., PageID #: 361.) The officers stopped behind the parked SUV, activated the police car's emergency flashing lights, and Officer Hazou looked up the license plate on the vehicle. Id. He determined that the SUV was registered to a woman's name. Id.
Officer Hazou and Officer Kubacki approached the SUV and noticed the driver was a man (Johnson). (R. 28-2, DX B, Hazou aff., PageID #: 362.) Officer Hazou asked Johnson what was wrong and Johnson stated he ran out of gas. Officer Hazou then asked Johnson for his driver's license. (Hazou aff., PageID #: 362; Johnson dep., PageID #: 295, 310.) Johnson asked him why they needed to see his identification, and refused to provide it. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 295, 297-299; Hazou aff., PageID #: 362.)
Johnson told the police officers that the vehicle had run out of gas, and that his wife was getting gas. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 310.) Officer Hazou responded that he still needed to see Johnson's identification and registration. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 310.) Johnson still refused to provide it, and continued to question why the police needed to see his license. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 310; Hazou aff., PageID #: 362.) Officer Hazou asserts that he referred to the Ohio Revised Code, to which he states Johnson responded, "it's a code, not the law." (Hazou aff., PageID #: 362.)
Johnson states that Officer Hazou told him that if he did not give him his identification and registration, they would arrest him. (Johnson dep., PageID #: 310.) Officer Hazou asserts that, after Johnson repeatedly refused to provide his license, Hazou ordered him out of the car.Officer Hazou states that he called for back-up assistance, after Johnson three times refused his order to exit the vehicle. (Hazou aff., PageID #: 362.)
Meanwhile, Officer Kubacki also advised Johnson that they needed to see his driver's license because they had stopped to check on him and his disabled vehicle, which was a hazard in the roadway, and they needed to identify who they were dealing with. (R. 28-3, DX C, Kubacki aff., PageID #: 364.) According to Officer Kubacki, Johnson continued to argue with the officers, and Kubacki informed him that, if he would not provide his license, he would be arrested. At that point, Officer Kubacki reports, he opened the driver's door. (Kubacki aff., PageID #: 365.)
Johnson's deposition testimony did not address the specific events of his actual arrest. The allegations of the complaint are that Johnson was "forcefully grabbed" by the arm, and "violently yanked" out of his car. (Compl., PageID #: 7.) The affidavit which Johnson has filed in support of his opposition to the motion appears to be more directed toward a subsequent criminal prosecution for, inter alia, resisting arrest in the Berea Municipal Court, than to this case. (R. 29-2, Plaintiff's Exhibit ("PX B"), G. Johnson aff., PageID #: 445.) Nevertheless, Johnson's affidavit states the following, in relation to the circumstances of his arrest:
(G. Johnson aff., PageID #: 445.) There is no reference in his affidavit as to any force used to effectuate his arrest.
In support of his opposition, Johnson also submitted an affidavit from his wife, Abigail L. Johnson, which again appears to be more directed to the Berea Municipal Court case, than to this case. (R. 29-1, PX A, A. Johnson aff., PageID #: 442.) On the issue of Johnson's arrest, Abigail Johnson states:
(A. Johnson aff., PageID #: 442-443.) There is no further reference in her affidavit as to any force used to effectuate Johnson's arrest.
According to Officer Kubacki's affidavit, the arrest proceeded as follows:
(Kubacki aff., PageID #: 365.)
Officer Hazou's affidavit indicates, in pertinent part, the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial