Johnson v. McDonald
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | YOUNG, Justice. |
| Citation | Johnson v. McDonald, 97 Colo. 324, 49 P.2d 1017 (Colo. 1935) |
| Decision Date | 09 September 1935 |
| Docket Number | 13764. |
| Parties | JOHNSON, Governor, et al. v. McDONALD. |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1935.
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; James C Starkweather, Judge.
Action by Jesse F. McDonald against Ed C. Johnson, as Governor, and others. To review a judgment after overruling their demurrer defendants bring error.
Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Paul P. Prosser, Atty. Gen., Charles Roach, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Pierpont Fuller, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen (Dines, Dines & Holme, of Denver, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.
Frazer Arnold, of Denver, for defendant in error.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error in the district court in and for the city and county of Denver to enjoin the plaintiffs in error from carrying out the provisions of chapter 181, Session Laws 1935 (page 941), approved March 7, 1935, which, together with chapter 124, Session Laws 1935 (page 462), approved April 4, 1935, was enacted to provide ways and means whereby the state of Colorado might procure from the federal government an advance of not to exceed $25,000,000 to be used during the present financial depression for the construction, supervision, and maintenance of public highways within the state of Colorado. The parties appear in the reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and for convenience will be herein designated as plaintiff and defendants. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled in the district court, defendant elected to stand thereon, judgment was entered against them, and an injunction granted as prayed. Defendants bring the cause here on writ of error to reverse that judgment.
Chapter 124, Session Laws 1935 (page 462), purporting to 'amend sections 1385 to 1418, both inclusive' of Compiled Laws of 1921, but in fact amending only sections 1391, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1413, and 1416 thereof, creates a state institution under section 1, article 8 of the Constitution (), a body corporate with power to adopt a common seal, to be known as the state highway department. This highway department is given the authority to exercise all powers given it from time to time by law, among which are the powers to lay out, construct, maintain, and supervise the state highways. The act creates two separate funds, one to be known as the state highway fund and the other to be known as the state highway supplementary fund, and provides that all moneys paid into either fund shall be immediately available without further appropriation for the purposes for which such fund was created, as provided by law; it authorizes payments from the fund by the state treasurer on warrants drawn as provided by law; and further provides that nothing in the act shall alter the manner of the execution and issuance of highway anticipation warrants as provided in chapter 181, supra.
Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of said chapter 124 (pages 464-468), being amended sections 1410, 1411, 1413, and 1416 of the Compiled Laws of 1921, are as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Gruen v. State Tax Commission
... ... past, courts have upheld statutes which have provided: (1) ... bounties for soldiers, see State ex rel. Atwood v ... Johnson, 170 Wis. 218, 175 N.W. 589, 7 A.L.R. 1636; (2) ... the issuance of bonds for the purpose of constructing a ... memorial to the soldiers ... for the purpose of paying the warrants. In Johnson v ... McDonald, 97 Colo. 324, 49 P.2d 1017, 1025, an action ... was brought to enjoin the carrying out of the provisions of ... the statute. There were ... ...
-
Lyons v. Bottolfsen
...173 S.C. 149, 175 S.E. 213; Ajax v. Gregory, 177 Wash. 465, 32 P.2d 560; Moses v. Meier, 148 Ore. 185, 35 P.2d 981; Johnson v. McDonald, 97 Colo. 324, 49 P.2d 1017; State ex rel. Capitol Building Com. v. Connelly, N.M. 312, 46 P.2d 1097, 100 A. L. R. 878; State ex rel. Dragstedt v. State Bo......
-
American Nat. Bank and Trust Co. v. Indiana Dept. of Highways
...Nelson, (1969) 105 Ariz. 76, 459 P.2d 509; California Toll Bridge Authority v. Kelly, (1933) 218 Cal. 7, 21 P.2d 425; Johnson v. McDonald, (1935) 97 Colo. 324, 49 P.2d 1017; State v. Florida State Improvement Commission, (1948) 160 Fla. 230, 34 So.2d 443; Farrell v. State Board of Regents, ......
-
Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005, In re
...purposes to meet it,' " it was not a "debt" within the meaning of section 3 of article XI. Id. (quoting Johnson v. McDonald, 97 Colo. 324, 340-41, 49 P.2d 1017, 1025 (1935)). In Johnson v. McDonald, we upheld two statutes that authorized the state to enter into a contract with the federal g......