Johnson v. Middlebrooks
| Decision Date | 06 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 24392.,24392. |
| Citation | 383 F.2d 386 |
| Parties | Clarence JOHNSON, Appellant, v. J. D. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Clarence Johnson, pro se.
Teddy W. Airhart, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., of Louisiana, for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, GEWIN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from the denial of appellant's petition for habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. On his state court trial appellant was represented by privately retained counsel and pled not guilty to a charge of illegal possession of narcotics in violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes 40:962. He was found guilty by a jury and sentenced on January 24, 1963, to serve ten years in the state penitentiary. Appellant attacks his conviction on three grounds: (1) that there was no probable cause for his arrest and therefore evidence obtained from the subsequent search and seizure was illegally obtained and admitted into evidence; (2) that he was denied a transcript of the state court proceedings; and (3) that he was convicted on insufficient evidence.
The pertinent facts are that on January 7, 1963, at about 9:55 P.M. Officers Verdi and Warner of the New Orleans Police Department observed appellant walking away from a bar near the intersection of Harmony and Lasalle Streets in New Orleans. This area was well known to the officers as a neighborhood inhabited by traffickers in narcotics. Approximately one hundred to one hundred fifty cases had originated in the immediate area to their knowledge. The officers also knew appellant as a self-admitted addict with whom they had often talked. When appellant saw the officers he did an about face and ran into the bar. The officers pursued appellant into the bar and made the arrest after discovering him emerging from behind a restroom door. The officers observed that he appeared to be quite nervous. Officer Verdi testified that it was his experience when dealing with persons possessing narcotics that they will usually run if they know the officers and are in possession of narcotics. Appellant had only run from the officers on one previous occasion, at which time he would not talk until he had swallowed something. On the occasion in question, a Vulcan match box containing five tinfoil packages of cocaine was removed from his clutched hand and later admitted into evidence.
We find appellant's contentions to be utterly without merit. As to his first allegation, state law is determinative of the validity of appellant's arrest Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lathers v. United States, 24226.
...granted) see 36 L.W. 3290, 36 L.W. 3398; Stone v. United States, 10 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 713, 716 (at 5, 6). See also Johnson v. Middlebrooks, 5 Cir. 1967, 383 F.2d 386, 387 (at 1), reviewing a state conviction. We hasten to point out that each of the above opinions is distinguishable in tha......
-
Walters v. City of Andalusia
..."Flight from law officers is evidence of guilt." Monnette v. United States, 299 F.2d 847, 851 (5th Cir.1962)22; Johnson v. Middlebrooks, 383 F.2d 386, 387 (5th Cir. 1967) ("Flight of the accused alone will not suffice to create probable cause for arrest, but is a factor to be considered.");......
-
Smith v. DIRECTOR, PATUXENT INST., STATE OF MD.
...of an arrest is to be determined in the light of state law insofar as it is not violative of the Constitution. See Johnson v. Middlebrooks, 383 F.2d 386, 387 (5th Cir. 1967). The general rule in Maryland is stated in Berigan v. State, 2 Md.App. 666, 669, 236 A.2d 743, 745 (1968): A peace of......
-
Lawrence v. Henderson
...v. Hanchey, 359 F.2d 724, 726 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 884, 87 S.Ct. 179, 17 L.Ed.2d 112 (1966); Johnson v. Middlebrooks, 383 F.2d 386, 387 (5th Cir. 1967). 8 "Art. 213. Arrest by officer without warrant; when A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person when: (1) The......