Johnson v. Moses, 404 U.S. 994 (U.S. 12/14/1971), 71-319.

Decision Date14 December 1971
Docket NumberNo. 71-319.,71-319.
CitationJohnson v. Moses, 404 U.S. 994 (U.S. 12/14/1971), 404 U.S. 994, No. 71-319. (Dec 14, 1971)
PartiesJOHNSON ET AL. v. MOSES ET AL.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Motion of Investment Company Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.Certiorari denied.Reported below: 445 F.2d 369.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
113 cases
  • Marin v. University of Puerto Rico
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • January 30, 1974
    ...Sword v. Fox (D.C.Va.1970), 317 F.Supp. 1055, 1062, rev. on other grounds (4 Cir. 1971), 446 F.2d 1091, 1099, cert. den. 404 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 534, 30 L. Ed.2d 547; and Sill v. Pennsylvania State University (D.C.Pa.1970), 318 F.Supp. 608, affd. (3 Cir. 1972), 462 F.2d 463. For a critical e......
  • Lessler v. Little, 88-1015
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • June 10, 1988
    ...prior to the 1970 amendments in which Congress made explicit that such a private cause of action exists), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 532, 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971). We recognize, of course, that Levitt and Moses were decided before Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 2......
  • King v. Douglass
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • December 23, 1996
    ...cert. denied, 429 U.S. 824, 97 S.Ct. 77, 50 L.Ed.2d 86 (1976); Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 532, 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); Levitt v. Johnson, 334 F.2d 815 (1st Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 961, 85 S.Ct. 649, 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965); Brouk v.......
  • Leist v. Simplot
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 23, 1981
    ...cert. dismissed, 409 U.S. 802, 93 S.Ct. 24, 34 L.Ed.2d 62 (1972); Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 532, 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); Fogel v. Chestnutt, 533 F.2d 731 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 824, 97 S.Ct. 77, 50 L.Ed.2d 86 (1976).14 While t......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Section 11.40 Appeal of Suppression Ruling and Post-Conviction Relief
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Criminal Practice Deskbook Chapter 11 Statements of a Defendant
    • Invalid date
    ...founded on an involuntary confession is a denial of due process); · State v. Stevens, 467 S.W.2d 10, 20 (Mo. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 (1971) (no objection was made to the admission of the statement at trial; the court will not review an objection raised for the first time on appeal......